Table 3 Two-way fixed-effects regression... | Duke University Press

Table 3

Two-way fixed-effects regression on female TFR with different development indicators

	Lag HLI	Lag HDI	Lag e₀
Linear	−0.075^**	44.862^**	−0.172^**
	(0.019)	(5.944)	(0.065)
Squared	0.0004^**	−21.614^**	0.001^*
	(0.0001)	(3.237)	(0.0004)
State Fixed Effects	Yes	Yes	Yes
Year Fixed Effects	Yes	Yes	Yes
Years	1969–2018	1990–2018	1969–2018
Number of Observations	2,550	1,428	2,550
Adjusted R²	.838	.874	.837
Within R²	.020	.10	.013
J-Shape	Yes	No	Yes
Turning Point	88.5	1.04	89.03
Confidence Interval	(87.57, 89.43)	(1.03, 1.05)	(87.79, 90.27)

	Lag HLI	Lag HDI	Lag e₀
Linear	−0.075^**	44.862^**	−0.172^**
	(0.019)	(5.944)	(0.065)
Squared	0.0004^**	−21.614^**	0.001^*
	(0.0001)	(3.237)	(0.0004)
State Fixed Effects	Yes	Yes	Yes
Year Fixed Effects	Yes	Yes	Yes
Years	1969–2018	1990–2018	1969–2018
Number of Observations	2,550	1,428	2,550
Adjusted R²	.838	.874	.837
Within R²	.020	.10	.013
J-Shape	Yes	No	Yes
Turning Point	88.5	1.04	89.03
Confidence Interval	(87.57, 89.43)	(1.03, 1.05)	(87.79, 90.27)

^*p < .05; ^**p < .01