Table 3

Weighted percentages of older adults reporting gaps in care with ADLs and IADLs, by family structure

Family StructureADLsIADLs
% Reporting Difficulty With at Least One ADL1+ Care Gap (%)a% Reporting Difficulty With at Least One IADL1+ Care Gap (%)a
Partnered, Has Biological Children 12.5 73.9 10.2 32.7 
Partnered, No Children 13.7 75.0 11.1 32.7 
Unpartnered, Has Biological Children 26.2 75.1 23.0 37.1 
Unpartnered, No Children 22.3 80.1 19.2 43.9 
% in Overall Sample 17.1 75.2 14.5 35.8 
Family StructureADLsIADLs
% Reporting Difficulty With at Least One ADL1+ Care Gap (%)a% Reporting Difficulty With at Least One IADL1+ Care Gap (%)a
Partnered, Has Biological Children 12.5 73.9 10.2 32.7 
Partnered, No Children 13.7 75.0 11.1 32.7 
Unpartnered, Has Biological Children 26.2 75.1 23.0 37.1 
Unpartnered, No Children 22.3 80.1 19.2 43.9 
% in Overall Sample 17.1 75.2 14.5 35.8 

Notes: Descriptive statistics for sociodemographic and other characteristics are shown in Table A1. The measure of family structure includes biological children only. Table A6 presents comparable data for other child types. A care gap for a task is operationalized as receiving no help with a reported difficulty in the last three months.

a

A Pearson chi-square test between characteristics and reported receipt of help in the last three months was significant at p < .05.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal