Duke University Press

Table 4

Latent status prevalence (δ estimates) and the transition matrix (τ estimates) over Years 1‒3 on women's contraceptive and exposure variables

	Single Abstinent Women		Consistently Covered Mothers		Stable Users		Sexually Active Nonusers		Condom Users		Intermittent Users		Transient Users
	$δ$ Estimates
	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n
Time
Year 1	.29	1,606	.18	997	.15	831	.14	776	.13	720	.08	443	.03	166
Year 2	.26	1,440	.18	997	.15	831	.15	831	.11	609	.10	554	.05	277
Year 3	.23	1,274	.18	997	.16	886	.17	942	.11	609	.10	554	.05	277
	$τ$ Estimates
Origin Latent Status
Single Abstinent Women	.790		.009		.023		.008		.026		.129		.015
Consistently Covered Mothers	.015		.912		.000		.051		.013		.005		.004
Stable Users	.025		.000		.759		.130		.036		.035		.016
Sexually Active Nonusers	.020		.058		.109		.733		.020		.019		.042
Condom Users	.023		.019		.087		.035		.643		.072		.121
Intermittent Users	.157		.011		.077		.082		.126		.461		.086
Transient Users	.000		.050		.120		.275		.156		.077		.323

	Single Abstinent Women		Consistently Covered Mothers		Stable Users		Sexually Active Nonusers		Condom Users		Intermittent Users		Transient Users
	$δ$ Estimates
	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n	$δ$	n
Time
Year 1	.29	1,606	.18	997	.15	831	.14	776	.13	720	.08	443	.03	166
Year 2	.26	1,440	.18	997	.15	831	.15	831	.11	609	.10	554	.05	277
Year 3	.23	1,274	.18	997	.16	886	.17	942	.11	609	.10	554	.05	277
	$τ$ Estimates
Origin Latent Status
Single Abstinent Women	.790		.009		.023		.008		.026		.129		.015
Consistently Covered Mothers	.015		.912		.000		.051		.013		.005		.004
Stable Users	.025		.000		.759		.130		.036		.035		.016
Sexually Active Nonusers	.020		.058		.109		.733		.020		.019		.042
Condom Users	.023		.019		.087		.035		.643		.072		.121
Intermittent Users	.157		.011		.077		.082		.126		.461		.086
Transient Users	.000		.050		.120		.275		.156		.077		.323

Note: Darker shading indicates greater probability of transitioning to a different status.