Table 3

Comparison of fit statistics for longitudinal models of self-rated health: National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, Waves I–V (1994–2019)

Modelχ2dfBICCFITLI1-RMSEANotes
Latent Time-Invariant With Freely Estimated Intercepts 2,014.645 15 1,873.385 0.928 0.899 0.896 Negative error variance for subjective health LV at Wave II 
Autoregressive (AR) 57.817 12 −55.191 0.998 0.997 0.982 — 
Linear Growth Curve 274.902 16 124.224 0.991 0.988 0.964 — 
Quadratic Growth Curve 48.552 12 −64.456 0.999 0.998 0.984 Negative error variance for subjective health LV at Wave I 
Freed Loading Growth Curve 46.457 13 −75.969 0.999 0.998 0.986 Negative error variance for subjective health LV at Wave II 
Modelχ2dfBICCFITLI1-RMSEANotes
Latent Time-Invariant With Freely Estimated Intercepts 2,014.645 15 1,873.385 0.928 0.899 0.896 Negative error variance for subjective health LV at Wave II 
Autoregressive (AR) 57.817 12 −55.191 0.998 0.997 0.982 — 
Linear Growth Curve 274.902 16 124.224 0.991 0.988 0.964 — 
Quadratic Growth Curve 48.552 12 −64.456 0.999 0.998 0.984 Negative error variance for subjective health LV at Wave I 
Freed Loading Growth Curve 46.457 13 −75.969 0.999 0.998 0.986 Negative error variance for subjective health LV at Wave II 

Notes: N = 12,300. Results are based on the DWLS estimator with its missing data procedures, as described in Asparouhov and Muthén (2010). All models control for age at the first wave, and observed SRH variances are constrained to be equal.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal