. | (1) . | (2) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mother | −0.050** | (0.016) | −0.060* | (0.025) |
Mother × Labor Market Segment (ref. = low-wage service) | ||||
Mother × professional/managerial | 0.008 | (0.023) | ||
Mother × Occupation (ref. = marketing manager) | ||||
Mother × cashier | 0.009 | (0.035) | ||
Mother × retail salesperson | 0.010 | (0.032) | ||
Mother × accountant | 0.036 | (0.034) | ||
Controls | Yes | Yes | ||
Number of Observations | 2,210 | 2,210 |
. | (1) . | (2) . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mother | −0.050** | (0.016) | −0.060* | (0.025) |
Mother × Labor Market Segment (ref. = low-wage service) | ||||
Mother × professional/managerial | 0.008 | (0.023) | ||
Mother × Occupation (ref. = marketing manager) | ||||
Mother × cashier | 0.009 | (0.035) | ||
Mother × retail salesperson | 0.010 | (0.032) | ||
Mother × accountant | 0.036 | (0.034) | ||
Controls | Yes | Yes | ||
Number of Observations | 2,210 | 2,210 |
Notes: Robust standard errors are shown in parentheses. All models control for order of application submission, résumé and cover letter template used, and cities. Model 1 includes labor market segment main effects, and Model 2 includes occupation main effects.
Source: Original experimental audit study data.
*p < .05; **p < .01 (two-tailed tests)