This essay argues that, in fictionalizing the 1898 Wilmington coup d’état, Charles W. Chesnutt’s The Marrow of Tradition (1901) constitutes the preeminent African American antiwar novel of the early twentieth century. It demonstrates how in the months leading up to the 1898 Wilmington Race Riot, conservative white North Carolinians recast racial equality as Black tyranny and then invoked the Declaration of Independence to portray their ensuing extralegal overthrow of elected authority as the newest iteration in a decades-long revolutionary battle against unconstitutional racial oppression. Finally, it argues that Marrow evokes, and then rejects as suicidal, the revolutionary martial traditions surrounding the coup and calls for Black retaliation, before offering a nonviolent alternative, associated with the female characters in the novel, to the martial consolidation of white political power during early Jim Crow.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
June 01 2025
Charles W. Chesnutt’s Moral Alternative to War in The Marrow of Tradition Available to Purchase
Evan Reibsome
Evan Reibsome is assistant professor of American literature at Louisiana State University Shreveport and the director of the Veterans Empathy Project. His research examines writers, from the Civil War to the War on Terror, whose work challenges popular ideologies of militarism and the idealizations of martial masculinity they promote.
Search for other works by this author on:
Twentieth-Century Literature (2025) 71 (2): 163–190.
Citation
Evan Reibsome; Charles W. Chesnutt’s Moral Alternative to War in The Marrow of Tradition. Twentieth-Century Literature 1 June 2025; 71 (2): 163–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462X-11836965
Download citation file:
Advertisement
66
Views