Totalitarianism has been a defining concept and issue in twentieth- and twenty-first-century political discourse, but it has rarely been analyzed with reference to either structures of racial domination in the United States or European colonialism. As Vaughn Rasberry explains in his magisterial study of race literature and the Cold War, intellectual debates about totalitarianism have tended to focus on Europe during World War II or to compare the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany in a manner that precludes discussion of the racial injustice stemming from democracy’s entanglement with colonialism and the slave trade. Race and the Totalitarian Century pushes beyond the Eurocentric focus of much scholarship on totalitarianism to present a theoretically sophisticated “revisionist account of black cultural production that demonstrates its diverse, and often unexpected, engagements with the century’s pressing dilemmas wrought by world war” (15). Such an approach not only generates significant new insights by demonstrating that an...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Book Review|
September 01 2018
Race and the Totalitarian Century: Geopolitics in the Black Literary Imagination by Vaughn Rasberry
Race and the Totalitarian Century: Geopolitics in the Black Literary Imagination
, by Rasberry, Vaughn. Cambridge, MA
: Harvard University Press
, 2016
. 496 pages.
Rachel Farebrother
Rachel Farebrother
Rachel Farebrother teaches English and American Studies at Swansea University. Author of The Collage Aesthetic in the Harlem Renaissance (2009), her essays have appeared in Journal of American Studies, Comparative American Studies, MELUS, Moving Worlds, and various edited collections, including Fionnghuala Sweeney and Kate Marsh’s Afromodernisms: Paris, Harlem, and the Avant-Garde (2013).
Search for other works by this author on:
Twentieth-Century Literature (2018) 64 (3): 371–378.
Citation
Rachel Farebrother; Race and the Totalitarian Century: Geopolitics in the Black Literary Imagination by Vaughn Rasberry. Twentieth-Century Literature 1 September 2018; 64 (3): 371–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462X-7142094
Download citation file:
Advertisement
102
Views