By reading Samuel Beckett’s famously “unreadable” novel Watt (1953) in context as a novel of the Irish Emergency, the neutral Irish Free State’s euphemism for World War II, this essay argues that Watt’s unreadability and encodedness are embodiments of the languages of post-traumatic stress and of Irish neutrality. Weaving together Beckett’s intertextual relationship with Dante’s Divine Comedy, the commonplace that Emergency-era Ireland was a cultural “purgatory,” and the language of trauma studies, this essay suggests that Watt can be productively read through the paradigm of purgatory. Beckett’s purgatory in the novel, however, is a failure by design: if purgatory represents the opportunity for expiation and for an eventual end of suffering, in Watt’s purgatory the possibility of such opportunity is a subject of mockery. “Beckett in Purgatory” thus offers Watt as a case study for how the trauma of war and, indeed, of neutrality, of missing the war, embeds itself in literary language that signs itself as “unreadable.”
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
September 01 2016
Beckett in Purgatory: “Unspeakable” Watt and the Second World War
Anna Teekell
Anna Teekell
§
Anna Teekell is assistant professor of English at Christopher Newport University and treasurer of the American Conference for Irish Studies. She has published essays in New Hibernia Review and Crosscurrents in Irish and Scottish Studies. Her first book, Emergency Writing: Irish Literature and the Second World War, is forthcoming from Northwestern University Press in the series “Cultural Expressions of World War II: Interwar Preludes, Responses, Memory.”
Search for other works by this author on:
Twentieth-Century Literature (2016) 62 (3): 247–270.
Citation
Anna Teekell; Beckett in Purgatory: “Unspeakable” Watt and the Second World War. Twentieth-Century Literature 1 September 2016; 62 (3): 247–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462X-3654191
Download citation file:
Advertisement