Thomas Pynchon’s Vineland (1990) met with a lukewarm critical reception. Critics fond of the novelist’s postmodern theatrics rejected its political didacticism, whereas politically didactic critical opponents of postmodernism rejected its lingering individualism and antiauthoritarian thinking. Caught between this rock and hard place, the novel became a casualty of an ongoing battle within the Left between postmodernists and proponents of Old Left structure. Neither camp accurately assessed Vineland, however, because the anarchist politics on which it is structured have been poorly understood in the academy. Turning a historicist eye toward the novel’s portrayal of the sixties, we see that it dramatizes actual debates among the New Left between anarchist figures, such as Paul Goodman and Murray Bookchin, and emergent neo-Leninist factions such as the Weather Underground and Progressive Labor Party. Speaking to contemporary leftists, the novel concludes that decentralist and grassroots anarchist politics can mediate between the New Left’s entropy and the Old Left’s hierarchy.
In Defense of Vineland: Pynchon, Anarchism, and the New Left
Michael O’Bryan is lecturer at the University of Missouri–St. Louis and at Washington University in St. Louis. His book project, “Spontaneous and Leaderless”: The Anarchist Impulse in Twentieth-Century Literary Experiment, argues that aesthetic homologies between works of fiction across the twentieth century stem from their shared engagement with the history of anarchist theory and practice.
Michael O’Bryan; In Defense of Vineland: Pynchon, Anarchism, and the New Left. Twentieth-Century Literature 1 March 2016; 62 (1): 1–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462X-3485002
Download citation file: