Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
undecidability
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-20 of 32 Search Results for
undecidability
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2022) 131 (2): 129–168.
Published: 01 April 2022
... There is an alternative way of carving up the terrain. Consider an epistemic conception of possibility according to which a claim is epistemically possible just in case it is compatible with what we can know. Both Undecidability and Contingency hold that it is epistemically possible that discursive cognizers with other...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2002) 111 (3): 341–371.
Published: 01 July 2002
... of propositional attitude other than
‘believes’, we get sentences like (6a) and (6b) that fail to be necessarily
equivalent:
(7a) Amy remembers the proposition that first-order logic is unde-
cidable.
(7b) Amy remembers that first-order logic is undecidable.
These sentences can differ in truth...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (2): 321–326.
Published: 01 April 2011
... in the theoretical apparatus of his book Thinking How
to Live, doesn’t explain the difference between thinking two options to both be
permissible and equally good (being indifferent) and suspending judgment on
whether either of two options is acceptable (being undecided).2
This reviewer was unconvinced...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (2): 326–329.
Published: 01 April 2011
... in the theoretical apparatus of his book Thinking How
to Live, doesn’t explain the difference between thinking two options to both be
permissible and equally good (being indifferent) and suspending judgment on
whether either of two options is acceptable (being undecided).2
This reviewer was unconvinced...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2002) 111 (4): 602–604.
Published: 01 October 2002
..., “Mathematical Objectivity and Mathematical Objects” and “Which
Undecidable Mathematical Sentences Have Determinate Truth Valuesare
both interesting (especially the latter, which purports to give a principled
defense of the fairly common “intuition” that formally undecidable proposi-
tions of elementary...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 241–244.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 244–247.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 247–250.
Published: 01 April 2009
... on the notion of a highest-
order framing principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 250–253.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 253–255.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 256–258.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 259–261.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 261–266.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 266–269.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 269–273.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2009) 118 (2): 273–276.
Published: 01 April 2009
... principle, the notion may ultimately be dispensable. The idea is
introduced to secure the designation of some faith-propositions as “essentially
evidentially undecidable” (139). But I think this requirement, its Jamesian
252
BOOK REVIEWS...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2003) 112 (3): 425–427.
Published: 01 July 2003
... to believe mathematics is true, and how it is
that we come to know these truths. In the later work, a radical position is
adopted according to which mathematics stands in no need of justification
external to mathematics itself.
The main focus of the discussion is on undecidable questions in set theory...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2015) 124 (1): 119–152.
Published: 01 January 2015
... could be astronomically large: it may contain as many symbols as there are atoms in the Milky Way galaxy. Finally, and more speculatively, even if the description of H is finite and of manageable length, it is still possible that it is formally undecidable , 33 or computationally intractable...
FIGURES
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2014) 123 (3): 339–342.
Published: 01 July 2014
... that Aristotle's texts ultimately leave it undecided whether the cognition, pleasure, and desire are all three (aspects of) some one thing, or whether some looser metaphysical relations obtain among them (24–36, esp. n. 9). However these relations are to be understood, Moss insists that the cognitive element...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2000) 109 (2): 290–293.
Published: 01 April 2000
... and program-
matic, is in many places quite illuminating. Tennant argues that the man-
ifestation argument yields a crucial implication: from a requirement of
manifestation and a supposition of bivalence to decidability. He cites the
well-known undecidability of arithmetic to argue...
1