1-5 of 5 Search Results for

sklar

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
×Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 April 2001) 110 (2): 289–290.
Published: 01 April 2001
...Lawrence Sklar EXPLAINING CHAOS. By Peter Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Pp. viii, 193. Cornell University 2001 BOOK FEVLEWS intuitionist notion of choice sequence (and thus the intuitionistic continu- um). Finally, in the last...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 April 2015) 124 (2): 269–272.
Published: 01 April 2015
...Mark Wilson Sklar Lawrence , Philosophy and the Foundations of Dynamics . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press , 2013 . ix + 272 pp . © 2015 by Cornell University 2015 In philosophy classes, we hear of the fabled struggles between theory T and T  ′, armored in their...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 October 2000) 109 (4): 653–661.
Published: 01 October 2000
.... Cambridge: MIT Press, Bradford Books, 2000. Pp. xi, 177. Theory and Truth: Philosophical Critique within Foundational Science. By Lawrence Sklar. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. x, 153. Ethical Explorations. By Jan Skorupski. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Pp. viii...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 July 2000) 109 (3): 349–371.
Published: 01 July 2000
... Sklar explores (but does not ultimately defend) the idea that a form of epistemic Conservatism can be founded on the pragmatic costs of belief change, and William Lycan has developed and defended such an approach at length.5 The main challenge for this sort of approach is to avoid col...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 April 2001) 110 (2): 151–197.
Published: 01 April 2001
... to project have been raised by Sklar in “Saving the Noumena” and “Semantic Analogy” (both reprinted in Sklar, Philosophy and Space-Tim Physics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985). “%he example is Putnam’s, in ‘What Theories Are Not.” 165...