...Ted A. Warfield PUTTING SKEPTICS IN THEIR PLACE: THE NATURE OF SKEPTICAL ARGUMENTS AND THEIR ROLE IN PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY. By John Greco. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Pp. xvi, 264. Cornell University 2001 BOOK REVIEWS...

...Ernesto V. Garcia Paul Franks, All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005. viii + 440 pp. Cornell University 2008 BOOK REVIEWS Paul Franks, All or Nothing...

...Paul Guyer Michael N. Forster, Kant and Skepticism . Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008. x + 154 pp. Cornell University 2009 BOOK REVIEWS Christopher Shields, Aristotle. London: Routledge, 2007. xvi + 456 pp. This delightful and fully engaging...

...Jonathan Cottrell De Pierris Graciela , Ideas, Evidence, and Method: Hume's Skepticism and Naturalism Concerning Knowledge and Causation . Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2015 . xv + 318 pp . © 2017 by Cornell University 2017 This is a rich, ambitious, and original study...

.... Fumerton, Richard. 1990 . “Metaepistemology and Skepticism.” In Doubting: Contemporary Perspectives on Skepticism, ed. Michael Roth and Glen Ross, 57 -68. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ____. 1995 . Metaepistemology and Skepticism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield. Gettier, Edmund...

...Robin McKenna; Duncan Pritchard DeRose Keith , The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context . vol. 1 . New York : Oxford University Press , 2009 fpage. xiii + 288 pp. © 2011 by Cornell University 2011 BOOK REVIEWS Alfred R...

...José L. Zalabardo Cornell University 2005 The Philosophical Review, Vol. 114, No. 1 (January 2005) Externalism, Skepticism, and the Problem of Easy Knowledge José L. Zalabardo 1. Bootstrapping We think that some...

...—as in the section “Of personal identity” and the Appendix—there cannot be a further perception in that mind, and so those perceptions do not form a whole. Hence, Hume's views were inconsistent. This essay argues that, unlike most others, this interpretation explains his retreat to skepticism in the Appendix. ©...

...Don Garrett Paul Russell, The Riddle of Hume's Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. xi + 424 pp. Cornell University 2010 BOOK REVIEWS Alexander Bird, Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford...

...Matthew McGrath [email protected] Pinillos Ángel , Why We Doubt: A Cognitive Account of Our Skeptical Inclinations . Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2023 . viii + 277 pp. © 2024 by Cornell University 2024 In Why We Doubt: A Cognitive Account of Our Skeptical...

...Gail Fine Cornell University 2000 The Philosophical Review, Vol. 109, No. 2 (April 2000) Descartes and Ancient Skepticism: Reheated Cabbage? Gail Fine 1. Lately, several commentators have argued...

...Paul Draper © 2012 by Cornell University 2012 Schellenberg J. L. , The Will to Imagine: A Justification of Skeptical Religion . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press , 2009 . xv +267 pp . BOOK REVIEWS Frederick C. Beiser, Diotima’s Children...

... for traditional skeptical views in epistemology. In particular, it argues that on certain popular views about the nature of belief, it is impossible to adopt the near-global agnosticism recommended by the skeptical epistemologist. On other plausible views, it is possible only in special circumstances...

...Sarah McGrath [email protected] Kagan Shelly , Answering Moral Skepticism . New York : Oxford University Press , 2023 . xiv + 391 pp. © 2025 by Cornell University 2025 The central goal of Answering Moral Skepticism is to defend moral realism against...

.... This article defends skepticism about the Lottery Requirement. It distinguishes three broad strategies of defending such a requirement: the surrogate satisfaction account, the procedural account, and the ideal consent account, and argues that none of these strategies succeed. The article then discusses...

... wrong with several of the sources of the temptation for thinking that such evidence does have skeptical implications. 3. He does this by insisting that the prior probability for any such model must be low enough that, even after we obtain any confirming evidence, the posterior remains extremely...

...-invariance in light of peer disagreement is sometimes rationally permissible and that, even when it is not, being required to revise your opinions in light of peer disagreement does not lead to any kind of problematic skepticism. © 2011 by Cornell University 2011 Acknowledgments to Tom Kelly...

...). It then defends the view from three serious skeptical challenges. There is a second general response to the theory-drenched skeptic, a “hoist with your own petard” reply. Recall that the skeptical strategy starts with some allegedly uncontroversial datum about excuses (“ignorance/luck excuses from...

... it have a distinctive phenomenology, beyond just imagery and feelings?). Cartesian skeptical scenarios undermine knowledge of ongoing conscious experience as well as knowledge of the outside world. Infallible judgments about ongoing mental states are simply banal cases of self-fulfillment. Philosophical...