Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
parenthetical verbs
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-12 of 12 Search Results for
parenthetical verbs
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2021) 130 (1): 97–143.
Published: 01 January 2021
..., parentheticalism opens the door to altogether eliminating the act-type of assertion from linguistic theorizing. © 2021 by Cornell University 2021 knowledge representation assertion, Moore's paradox parenthetical verbs use-conditional meaning References Adler, Jonathan. 2002. Belief's Own Ethics...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (4): 525–554.
Published: 01 October 2008
...) may also be shifted by operators in the representation language. Indeed verbs that create hyperintensional contexts, like `think', are treated as operators that simultaneously shift the world and assignment parameters. By contrast, metaphysical modal operators shift the world of assessment only. Names...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (4): 594–598.
Published: 01 October 2011
..., for example; but create no rights. The
2. David Hume, ATreatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000). Parenthetical references take the form ‘T’ followed by
book, part, section, and paragraph numbers. First published 1739–40.
3. David Hume...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (4): 598–602.
Published: 01 October 2011
..., for example; but create no rights. The
2. David Hume, ATreatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000). Parenthetical references take the form ‘T’ followed by
book, part, section, and paragraph numbers. First published 1739–40.
3. David Hume...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (4): 603–607.
Published: 01 October 2011
..., for example; but create no rights. The
2. David Hume, ATreatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000). Parenthetical references take the form ‘T’ followed by
book, part, section, and paragraph numbers. First published 1739–40.
3. David Hume...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (4): 607–609.
Published: 01 October 2011
..., for example; but create no rights. The
2. David Hume, ATreatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000). Parenthetical references take the form ‘T’ followed by
book, part, section, and paragraph numbers. First published 1739–40.
3. David Hume...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (4): 587–591.
Published: 01 October 2011
..., for example; but create no rights. The
2. David Hume, ATreatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000). Parenthetical references take the form ‘T’ followed by
book, part, section, and paragraph numbers. First published 1739–40.
3. David Hume...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (4): 591–594.
Published: 01 October 2011
..., for example; but create no rights. The
2. David Hume, ATreatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000). Parenthetical references take the form ‘T’ followed by
book, part, section, and paragraph numbers. First published 1739–40.
3. David Hume...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (4): 449–485.
Published: 01 October 2006
...
adhere to any instance of the following schema:
You should X Y only if it is rational for you to X Y, (3),
where X is a verb, Y either a noun phrase or a propositional phrase, and
“to X Y ” is something (“suffi ciently”) under the control of our will (we
do not predicate rationality...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2002) 111 (4): 497–537.
Published: 01 October 2002
...-
guistic meaning and the sense of a supplemented expression, effec-
tively eliminating any pressure to distinguish between them. If there
remains any such distinction here, it threatens to be a distinction with-
out a difference.
If the mere indexical or the mere present tense verb does not
express...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (4): 449–495.
Published: 01 October 2010
... principles of uniform translation (Guyer and
Wood 1998, 73) “cognizing” would be appropriate only if the corresponding verb was
“erkennen.” Kemp Smith (1933) offers “without knowing anything of it either by direct
acquaintance or otherwise.” However, as Kitcher notes, this both misleadingly deploys...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2023) 132 (2): 173–238.
Published: 01 April 2023
..., for instance, R , λ x y . R x y , λ z w . R z w , λ x . R x x , λ x y . R y x , and so on, will all denote entities with the same simple constituents. (The parenthetical about number is there to make sure that we can register the difference between the number...