1-2 of 2

Search Results for oic

Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article

“Ought” Implies “Can” but Does Not Imply “Must”: An Asymmetry between Becoming Infeasible and Becoming Overridden

Available to Purchase
Peter B. M. Vranas
The Philosophical Review (2018) 127 (4): 487–514.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-6973023
Published: 01 October 2018
...Peter B. M. Vranas The claim that (OIC) “ought” implies “can” (i.e., you have an obligation only at times at which you can obey it) entails that (1) obligations that become infeasible are lost (i.e., you stop having an obligation when you become unable to obey it). Moreover, the claim that (2...
View articletitled, “Ought” Implies “Can” but Does Not Imply “Must”: An Asymmetry between Becoming Infeasible and Becoming Overridden View PDF for article titled, “Ought” Implies “Can” but Does Not Imply “Must”: An Asymmetry between Becoming Infeasible and Becoming Overridden
Journal Article

'Ought' and Ability

Available to Purchase
Peter A. Graham
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (3): 337–382.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1263674
Published: 01 July 2011
... the following principle attractive: ‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’ (OIC): Necessarily, S ought to w only if S can w.1 It has also been used to do a lot of philosophical work.2 First, OIC has been used to argue that moral dilemmas—situ- ations in which a person has two moral obligations...
View articletitled, 'Ought' and Ability View PDF for article titled, 'Ought' and Ability