1-20 of 78 Search Results for

jone

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
×Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2009) 118 (1): 29–57.
Published: 01 January 2009
...Trenton Merricks Suppose that time t is just a few moments from now. And suppose that the proposition that Jones sits at t was true a thousand years ago. Does the thousand-years-ago truth of that proposition imply that Jones's upcoming sitting at t will not be free? This article argues that it does...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 October 2012) 121 (4): 634–636.
Published: 01 October 2012
...Lorraine Besser-Jones Sobel Jordan Howard , Walls and Vaults: A Natural Science of Morals (Virtue Ethics according to David Hume) . Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley and Sons , 2009 . xiii + 414 pp . © 2012 by Cornell University 2012 BOOK REVIEWS Huw Price, Naturalism Without Mirrors...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 July 2010) 119 (3): 315–336.
Published: 01 July 2010
..., Black, has come out of retirement to participate in yet another philo- sophical example.2 (After all, what would these thought-experiments be without the venerable eminence´ grise—or should it be noire?) He has secretly inserted a chip in Jones’s brain that enables Black to...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 October 2011) 120 (4): 567–586.
Published: 01 October 2011
... true a thousand years in the future: (1*) Jones has no choice about: that Jones sits at t will be true a thousand years from now. (2*) Necessarily, if that Jones sits at t will be true a thousand years from now, then Jones sits at time t. Therefore...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 October 2013) 122 (4): 619–639.
Published: 01 October 2013
... freedom shows that something is wrong with this reasoning, not that such prepunishment is compatible with freedom. Suppose that ten days ago God prepunished Jones for sitting at t . And suppose Jones's punishment took the following form: spending ten hours in his local jail. So ten days ago Jones spent...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2011) 120 (1): 97–115.
Published: 01 January 2011
... TODD 2. Merricks’s Argument Here is the Main Argument and Merricks’s initial reflections on it: Let time t be just a few minutes in the future from now, and consider the Main Argument: (1) Jones has no choice about: that Jones sits at t was true a thousand years...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 April 2008) 117 (2): 310–313.
Published: 01 April 2008
... expressed by the self-ascription, issued simply so as to give voice to one’s sincere judgment about one’s own state of mind. But how should we understand this last claim? Suppose that Jones’s unconscious fear of members of another ethnic group causes her to be much too easily convinced that...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 October 2012) 121 (4): 643–644.
Published: 01 October 2012
... David Hume) reviewed by Lorraine Besser-Jones 634 Stanley, Jason, Knowledge and Practical Interests reviewed by Ram Neta 298 Strevens, Michael, Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation reviewed by Lina Jansson 625 Talbott, William J., Human Rights and Human Well-Being reviewed by...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 July 2017) 126 (3): 301–343.
Published: 01 July 2017
... true but ⌜S would ϕ if she tried⌝ is false. Consider the following case, adapted from Austin 1961 . Jones is a skilled golfer with an easy shot onto the green. Matt says: (30) Jones is able to make this shot right now. Matt has said something true. Now suppose Jones takes the shot and misses the...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2001) 110 (1): np.
Published: 01 January 2001
... Edited by the Faculty of the Sage School of Philosophy of Cornell University: Richard Boyd, Gail Fine, Carl Ginet (Emeritus), Harold Hodes, T. H. Irwin, Karen Jones, David Lyons (Emeritus), Scott MacDonald, Richard W. Miller, Michele Moody-Adams, Frederick Neuhouser, Sydney Shoemaker, Henry...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 April 2002) 111 (2): 281–284.
Published: 01 April 2002
... for withholding endorsement. Sellars does not maintain, as they claim (28), “that when we say x looks green to Jones, we are saying that Jones has an initial tendency, perhaps rightfully suppressed on reflection, to believe that x is green.” Nor does he hold, as they suggest (22), that ‘looks...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 July 2016) 125 (3): 439–447.
Published: 01 July 2016
..., according to assessment relativism, that one should retract an assertion that one was permitted to make in the first place? Often one retracts a past assertion so as not to continue to risk misleading the audience one was addressing at the time of the assertion. Suppose Jones asserts on the stump that his...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2010) 119 (1): 77–95.
Published: 01 January 2010
... have different color chalk for different purposes. If one of them, Jones, writes a declarative sen- tence ‘Q’ in yellow chalk on his board and presents it to his interlocutor, Smith, then by convention this counts as Jones asserting that Q. If Smith chooses, she may hand Jones a piece of purple...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 July 2000) 109 (3): 373–408.
Published: 01 July 2000
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2006) 115 (1): 79–103.
Published: 01 January 2006
... inherits the causal powers of the entity it depends on.9 So suppose Smith fatally shoots Jones. Smith’s shooting or the fact that Smith shot Jones is causally relevant to Jones’s death. But Smith or Wesson shot Jones in virtue of the fact that Smith shot Jones. So maybe the fact that Smith or...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2009) 118 (1): 103–107.
Published: 01 January 2009
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2009) 118 (1): 108–112.
Published: 01 January 2009
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2009) 118 (1): 112–115.
Published: 01 January 2009
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2009) 118 (1): 115–121.
Published: 01 January 2009
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (1 January 2009) 118 (1): 121–127.
Published: 01 January 2009