Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
harm
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-20 of 224 Search Results for
harm
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2021) 130 (3): 463–467.
Published: 01 July 2021
...Mari Mikkola [email protected] McGowan Mary Kate , Just Words: On Speech and Hidden Harm . Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2019 209 pp. © 2021 by Cornell University 2021 This relatively short book has a powerful message. It identifies an overlooked way in which...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (2): 243–246.
Published: 01 April 2006
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2002) 111 (3): 417–428.
Published: 01 July 2002
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2002) 111 (3): 483–486.
Published: 01 July 2002
..., that is, the responsibility of
individuals for their participation in collective harms. While there has not been
a lot of philosophical work on this topic, there has been some good work, and
Kutz is responsive to most of it. But basically, this book strikes out on its own,
building a conception of complicity from...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2017) 126 (2): 295–300.
Published: 01 April 2017
... for them. Consider someone who buys factory-farmed chicken from his local grocery store. His purchases didn't cause the harms that led to that meat being available to him, and given the waste and noise in the supply chain, they won't cause any future harms either. This is the causal impotence problem...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2025) 134 (1): 104–108.
Published: 01 January 2025
... for some lesser kind of legal intervention and regulation (Wall is explicit that his discussion is not restricted to just criminalization [2]). The book is divided into two parts. In the first, Wall revisits familiar themes and contributions here, mostly discussing Mill’s Harm Principle...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (3): 433–463.
Published: 01 July 2020
... of killing defensive killing liability to defensive harm Consider the following case: How to Rescue : Attacker has kidnapped Victim and will kill her unless you intervene. You can rescue Victim now by killing Attacker. Alternatively, you can wait ten minutes until Attacker’s back is turned. You can...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2004) 113 (4): 584–587.
Published: 01 October 2004
... that they
are supporting, for the deprivation of the poor. The duty to alleviate world pov-
erty is a duty of justice that the rich have because they are unjustly harming the
poor. Thus one of Pogge’s primary goals is to show the different and complex
ways in which members of well-off countries are harming the global...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (1): 135–139.
Published: 01 January 2020
... of unjustified harm. This focus on liability in war has two important upshots. First, it implies that combatants whose wars are unjust have no moral reason to target enemy soldiers rather than civilians, since all of their targets are innocent (none are morally responsible for threats of unjustified harm...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2012) 121 (4): 611–618.
Published: 01 October 2012
... that I
would be rationally justified in risking serious harm by rushing into a
burning building by the following reason: that by doing so I might well
save a child. But no reasonable person thinks that this reason rationally
requires me to do so. So this particular altruistic reason can rationally...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2017) 126 (2): 285–295.
Published: 01 April 2017
... not harm them or cause them to suffer. The validity of reasons of this kind presuppose the authority of the person making the demand and the agent's accountability to them (83). If Darwall is correct about the very existence, nature and persuasiveness of these reasons, and to my mind he is, we have...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (4): 533–562.
Published: 01 October 2007
... actions, in the same
sort of way that some principles of morality entail that a certain class of
considerations (say, considerations of self-defense) can serve to mitigate
(sometimes completely) the immorality of harming others. In that case,
some reasons will be stronger than others as mitigators...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2003) 112 (2): 215–245.
Published: 01 April 2003
... as rival virtues. Pru-
dence, as traditionally conceived, is temporally neutral. It attaches no
intrinsic significance to the temporal location of benefits or harms
within the agent’s life; the prudent agent should be equally concerned
about all parts of her life. But people’s values and ideals often...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (2): 159–191.
Published: 01 April 2008
...
to count at least some harms and goods of others as contributing to the rightness
and wrongness of actions. Obviously Mill accepts this extremely weak claim. Yet he
repeatedly denies the stricter demands of deontic impartiality, as in his 1862 letter
to Grote (no. 525), where he explicates his argument...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2023) 132 (1): 158–163.
Published: 01 January 2023
... to ban pornography have not only been ineffective in eliminating violent and degrading pornography but have been harmful to members of sexual minorities. Srinivasan goes beyond ACLU liberalism, however, in acknowledging the harm that “mainstream” pornography does, harm that may not be eliminable by “more...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2014) 123 (2): 238–241.
Published: 01 April 2014
... on the assumption that “ being able to choose what to believe and how to live (within certain side-constraints [most notably, Mill's Harm Principle]) makes for a better life” (17–18). The third, epistemic utilitarian argument is grounded in the idea that permitting undesirable beliefs and practices is necessary...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2003) 112 (1): 121–123.
Published: 01 January 2003
... with the subjects over what constitutes sex-
ual harassment is not question begging, though. Social theorists often claim
that the victims of oppression are unaware that the harm they suffer is oppres-
sion, but to define it as such is not question begging, provided that they make
a case for their definition...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (2): 306–310.
Published: 01 April 2008
...—that is, rationally permitted—to go to great lengths to save someone
else from harm, but are not required to do so. We can think of many circum-
stances in which there would be nothing irrational in deciding to donate $200
to charity (one has a good salary and none of one’s important needs would
be thereby...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2016) 125 (4): 473–507.
Published: 01 October 2016
... and son will likely suffer substantial harms: the distress of not knowing where Mustapha is or even if he is alive; the worry that perhaps he abandoned them and, if so, that he really didn't love them the way they'd thought; the inability to mourn Mustapha and carry out proper burial rituals...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (2): 267–272.
Published: 01 April 2007
... of harm
is superceded by the morality of respect for what a person wills and her invio-
lability. Hence, McMahan’s primary concern is to see how the Equal Wrong-
ness Thesis (i.e., the view that it is equally wrong to kill a person who will lose
a great deal in dying and a person who will not lose...
1