... with deontological ones. But despite the current ubiquity of the term ‘consequentialism’, in this essay I will primarily be using the pre-Anscombian term ‘teleology’ to refer to the type of ethical and epistemic theories under consideration. My main reason for doing so is that the phrase ‘epistemic consequentialism...

... and obligation. Section 5 takes stock and reassesses the score in the debate. © 2020 by Cornell University 2020 epistemic consequentialism epistemic deontology epistemic value epistemic justification ethics of belief While there has been a recent backlash against epistemic consequentialism...

... -30. Reprinted in Alston 1989, 319-49.Page references are to reprint. ____. 1986b . “Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 14 : 179 -221. Reprinted in Alston 1989, 185-226. Page references are to reprint. ____. 1988 . “The Deontological Conception of Epistemic...

... beliefs involve…a metaphysics of ultimate reality” (47). But Leiter mistakenly equates the metaphysical nature of religious beliefs with their transcending empirical evidence and then mistakenly reduces the metaphysical condition to the epistemic condition of evidential insulation. The main problem...

... and the Development of Epistemic Modality.” English Language and Linguistics 2 : 295 –317. Radford, Andrew. 2004 . Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Romero, Céline. 2005. “L'évolution syntaxique des verbes modaux dans l'histoire de l'anglais...

... the board. Where the 1970s had been dominated by Kantian deontological moral and political theory, owing mainly to Rawls's influence, Parfit vigorously defended teleology in its most radical form: act consequentialism grounded in an “ultimate moral aim: that outcomes be as good as possible.” 1 Rawls had...

... to Little’s discussion of epistemic generalities.) In sum, reasons holism doesn’t establish metaphysical particularism, because some neglected forms of generalism can account for it. Therefore I strongly suspect that the papers collected in Moral Particularism proceed from a false consensus...

.... References Alston William P. 1988 . “ The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification .” Philosophical Perspectives 2 : 257 – 99 . Aristotle . 2008 . Politics , trans. Jowett Benjamin Davis Henry William Carless . New York : Cosimo Inc. Brandom Robert...

...), and that such reflection is a duty (A/B: 263/319). 1 But for Merritt the reflective ideal goes beyond a supposed duty to reflect. It also points to the “supreme value Kant accords to being rationally reflective” (2). The ideal therefore covers both the axiological and deontological theses Kant advances with respect...

... and very explicitly as a response to racial injustice. As theoretically elegant as Shelby's recommendation is, Mills remains dissatisfied. Of the many objections he lobs at Shelby, two seem most potent. First, Rawls's theory is radically deontological, thus is not a candidate for ostensibly...

... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre- tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”) conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...

... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre- tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”) conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...

... interpre- tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”) conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability of being true. Examples of claims that Russell appears...

... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre- tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”) conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...

... interpre- tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”) conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability of being true. Examples of claims that Russell appears...

... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre- tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”) conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...

... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre- tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”) conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...

... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre- tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”) conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...

... on the important facts of the case and are merely disagreeing on whether the word ‘lie’ should be used to de- scribe it. A third example: suppose that the epistemic theory of vagueness (Williamson 1994) is correct, so that there is a sharp but unknowable boundary between cases in which a person is tall...

.... Tomberlin, 57 -89. Cambridge: Blackwell. Feldman, Richard, and Earl Conee. 1985 . “Evidentialism.” Philosophical Studies 48 : 15 -34. Foley, Richard. 2000 . “Epistemically Rational Belief and Responsible Belief.” In Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy , ed. R. Cobb-Stevens...