Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
epistemic deontology
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-20 of 39
Search Results for epistemic deontology
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Journal Article
Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2013) 122 (3): 337–393.
Published: 01 July 2013
... theories I have just mentioned are nonteleological in structure, it is tempting to refer to them as examples of what might be called “epistemic deontology.” However, that temptation should be resisted, for two reasons. First, the name “epistemic deontology” has already been appropriated by epistemologists...
Journal Article
Epistemic Rationality and the Value of Truth
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2024) 133 (4): 329–365.
Published: 01 October 2024
... of distinctively epistemic normative standards without sacrificing extensional adequacy. But this article proposes that veritism cannot fulfill this promise. It goes on to explain why not, in part by showing that three radically different developments of veritism—one consequentialist, one deontological, and one...
Journal Article
An Epistemic Nonconsequentialism
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (1): 1–51.
Published: 01 January 2020
... and obligation. Section 5 takes stock and reassesses the score in the debate. © 2020 by Cornell University 2020 epistemic consequentialism epistemic deontology epistemic value epistemic justification ethics of belief While there has been a recent backlash against epistemic consequentialism...
Journal Article
Externalism and Skepticism
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2000) 109 (2): 159–194.
Published: 01 April 2000
... -30. Reprinted in Alston 1989, 319-49.Page references are to reprint. ____. 1986b . “Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 14 : 179 -221. Reprinted in Alston 1989, 185-226. Page references are to reprint. ____. 1988 . “The Deontological Conception of Epistemic...
Journal Article
Why Tolerate Religion?
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2014) 123 (2): 238–241.
Published: 01 April 2014
...Samuel C. Rickless Leiter Brian , Why Tolerate Religion? Princeton : Princeton University Press , 2013 . 192 pp . © 2014 by Cornell University 2014 This book considers the important question whether a good moral case can be made, on deontological or consequentialist grounds...
Journal Article
Ought , Agents, and Actions
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (1): 1–41.
Published: 01 January 2011
... and the Development of Epistemic Modality.” English Language and Linguistics 2 : 295 –317. Radford, Andrew. 2004 . Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Romero, Céline. 2005. “L'évolution syntaxique des verbes modaux dans l'histoire de l'anglais...
Journal Article
Agreement Matters: Critical Notice of Derek Parfit, On What Matters
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2014) 123 (1): 79–105.
Published: 01 January 2014
... the board. Where the 1970s had been dominated by Kantian deontological moral and political theory, owing mainly to Rawls's influence, Parfit vigorously defended teleology in its most radical form: act consequentialism grounded in an “ultimate moral aim: that outcomes be as good as possible.” 1 Rawls had...
Journal Article
Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2002) 111 (3): 483–486.
Published: 01 July 2002
... to Little’s discussion of epistemic generalities.)
In sum, reasons holism doesn’t establish metaphysical particularism,
because some neglected forms of generalism can account for it. Therefore I
strongly suspect that the papers collected in Moral Particularism proceed from
a false consensus...
Journal Article
The Impossibility of Skepticism
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2012) 121 (3): 317–358.
Published: 01 July 2012
.... References Alston William P. 1988 . “ The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification .” Philosophical Perspectives 2 : 257 – 99 . Aristotle . 2008 . Politics , trans. Jowett Benjamin Davis Henry William Carless . New York : Cosimo Inc. Brandom Robert...
Journal Article
Kant on Reflection and Virtue
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2021) 130 (2): 311–315.
Published: 01 April 2021
...), and that such reflection is a duty (A/B: 263/319). 1 But for Merritt the reflective ideal goes beyond a supposed duty to reflect. It also points to the “supreme value Kant accords to being rationally reflective” (2). The ideal therefore covers both the axiological and deontological theses Kant advances with respect...
Journal Article
Black Rights/White Wrongs: The Critique of Racial Liberalism
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2019) 128 (4): 532–536.
Published: 01 October 2019
... and very explicitly as a response to racial injustice. As theoretically elegant as Shelby's recommendation is, Mills remains dissatisfied. Of the many objections he lobs at Shelby, two seem most potent. First, Rawls's theory is radically deontological, thus is not a candidate for ostensibly...
Journal Article
Evaluative Uncertainty and Permissible Preference
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2025) 134 (1): 35–64.
Published: 01 January 2025
... depending on the probabilities relative to which this expectation is calculated. The most natural candidates seem to be the subjective probabilities, which are given by your current credences, and the evidential or epistemic probabilities, which can be thought of as the credences that are most...
Journal Article
Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 97–99.
Published: 01 January 2010
... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre-
tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”)
conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively
entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...
Journal Article
Wittgenstein's Apprenticeship with Russell
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 100–103.
Published: 01 January 2010
... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre-
tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”)
conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively
entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...
Journal Article
Kantian Ethics
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 104–108.
Published: 01 January 2010
... interpre-
tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”)
conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively
entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability of
being true. Examples of claims that Russell appears...
Journal Article
The Riddle of Hume's Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 108–112.
Published: 01 January 2010
... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre-
tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”)
conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively
entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...
Journal Article
Free Riding
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 112–115.
Published: 01 January 2010
... interpre-
tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”)
conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively
entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability of
being true. Examples of claims that Russell appears...
Journal Article
Morality and Political Violence
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 115–117.
Published: 01 January 2010
... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre-
tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”)
conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively
entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...
Journal Article
Oxford Studies in Metaphysics
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 118–123.
Published: 01 January 2010
... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre-
tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”)
conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively
entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...
Journal Article
Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science
Available to Purchase
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 123–126.
Published: 01 January 2010
... in the Treatise that can be solved only by the irreligious interpre-
tation. By ‘Hume’s skepticism’, Russell evidently means radical (“Pyrrhonian”)
conclusions about reason and evidence, conclusions individually or collectively
entailing that no beliefs have any epistemic merit or substantial probability...
1