1-20 of 79 Search Results for

epistemic consequentialism

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (3): 484–489.
Published: 01 July 2020
...Kevin Dorst Ahlstrom-Vij Kristoffer and Dunn Jeffrey , eds., Epistemic Consequentialism . Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2018 . vii + 335 pp. © 2020 by Cornell University 2020 Epistemic consequentialism is the view that (at least some) features of epistemic...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (1): 1–51.
Published: 01 January 2020
...Kurt L. Sylvan Despite the recent backlash against epistemic consequentialism, an explicit systematic alternative has yet to emerge. This article articulates and defends a novel alternative, Epistemic Kantianism , which rests on a requirement of respect for the truth . Section 1 tackles some...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2021) 130 (3): 339–383.
Published: 01 July 2021
... belief rationally guides and constrains imagination. Section 7 discusses objections and the significance of this project and analyzes its relation to other questions in epistemology including epistemic consequentialism. The exploration/exploitation trade-off is a formal device grounded...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2013) 122 (3): 337–393.
Published: 01 July 2013
...’, in this essay I will primarily be using the pre-Anscombian term ‘teleology’ to refer to the type of ethical and epistemic theories under consideration. My main reason for doing so is that the phrase ‘epistemic consequentialism’ is liable to cause confusion in a way that the phrase ‘epistemic teleology’ does...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2014) 123 (1): 79–105.
Published: 01 January 2014
... consequentialism to defending rule consequentialism. Why does the desire to be in agreement pervade OWM , as it did not RP ? Partly Parfit is moved by the general epistemological problem of disagreement between epistemic peers. Parfit tells us that although he had initially intended to think further about...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2021) 130 (2): 191–226.
Published: 01 April 2021
... on my new total evidence, that is, not on my assessment of the evidence which includes the existence of the disagreement. To illustrate, assume an individual who has a high credence that consequentialism is true meets an epistemic peer with a low credence that consequentialism is true; assume...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (2): 211–249.
Published: 01 April 2020
..., and to participants at the Pacific APA in 2017; the Normativity Workshop, NYU Abu Dhabi in 2016; the Workshop on Epistemic Consequentialism at the University of Kent, June 2015; the Centre for Ethics and Metaethics (at Leeds); and a graduate seminar at Stanford in 2017. The order of the authors' names is alphabetical...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2013) 122 (4): 671–672.
Published: 01 October 2013
... © 2013 by Cornell University 2013 Ahmed, Arif , Causal Decision Theory         289 Berker, Selim , Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions         337 Bommarito, Nicolas , Modesty as a Virtue of Attention         93 Caie, Michael , Rational...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (1): 1–50.
Published: 01 January 2007
... Natural Religion orig. pub. in 1779] Jackson, Frank. 1991 . “Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection.” Ethics 101 : 461 -82. Jordan, Jeff, ed. 1994 . Gambling on God: Essays on Pascal's Wager . Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Kagan, Shelly, and Peter...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 105–107.
Published: 01 January 2006
... consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty of the theory they defend. The much-discussed paper “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality” responds to the complaint...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 108–112.
Published: 01 January 2006
... to questions in normative ethics. Two of the essays here consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty of the theory they defend. The much-discussed paper “Alienation, Consequentialism...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 112–115.
Published: 01 January 2006
... to questions in normative ethics. Two of the essays here consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty of the theory they defend. The much-discussed paper “Alienation, Consequentialism...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 115–117.
Published: 01 January 2006
... to questions in normative ethics. Two of the essays here consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty of the theory they defend. The much-discussed paper “Alienation, Consequentialism...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 118–121.
Published: 01 January 2006
... to questions in normative ethics. Two of the essays here consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty of the theory they defend. The much-discussed paper “Alienation, Consequentialism...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 121–124.
Published: 01 January 2006
... consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty of the theory they defend. The much-discussed paper “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality” responds to the complaint...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 124–127.
Published: 01 January 2006
...- ton puts it (126). The middle section of this volume is devoted to questions in normative ethics. Two of the essays here consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 127–131.
Published: 01 January 2006
... consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty of the theory they defend. The much-discussed paper “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality” responds to the complaint...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (1): 131–133.
Published: 01 January 2006
... to questions in normative ethics. Two of the essays here consider and defend a fairly straightforward vari- ety of consequentialism; they are noteworthy because of the way in which they proceed, if not for the novelty of the theory they defend. The much-discussed paper “Alienation, Consequentialism...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2021) 130 (2): 227–262.
Published: 01 April 2021
... also Berker 2013 for a critical review of epistemic consequentialism.  1. Throughout, I use ‘introspection’ broadly to include any distinctive method we have for knowing our beliefs, including alleged methods that don't involve ‘looking inward’. I am very grateful to Paul Boghossian...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2001) 110 (3): 428–430.
Published: 01 July 2001
... pursue one issue here, after sketching the project of each substantial chapter. (i) Chapter 2 supports moral theory construction over particularism. The latter is argued to have the disadvantage of entailing that we lack epistemic justification for our moral beliefs. Chapter 3...