Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Search Results for
case
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- Title
- Authors
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keywords
- DOI
- ISBN
- eISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-20 of 1019 Search Results for
case
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
1
Sort by
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (2): 251–266.
Published: 01 April 2007
...Robert Stalnaker Cornell University 2007 Critical Notice of Scott Soames’s Case
against Two-Dimensionalism
Robert Stalnaker
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
This rich and stimulating book1 gives both a clear...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2007) 116 (3): 465–467.
Published: 01 July 2007
...Thomas Hofweber Jody Azzouni, Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism . New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. viii + 241 pp. Cornell University 2007 BOOK REVIEWS
Jody Azzouni, Defl ating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism.
New...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (2): 159–191.
Published: 01 April 2008
... liberty and his embrace of supererogation, both of which elude traditional interpretations. Cornell University 2008 Utilitarianism without Consequentialism:
The Case of John Stuart Mill
Daniel Jacobson
Bowling Green State University...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (3): 337–364.
Published: 01 July 2010
... . The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde , ed. Richard Dury. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Thomasson, Amie. 1999 . Fiction and Metaphysics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Van Inwagen, Peter. 1977 . “Creatures of Fiction.” American Philosophical Quarterly 24 : 299 –308...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2011) 120 (3): 455–460.
Published: 01 July 2011
...Robin McKenna; Duncan Pritchard DeRose Keith , The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context . vol. 1 . New York : Oxford University Press , 2009 fpage. xiii + 288 pp. © 2011 by Cornell University 2011 BOOK REVIEWS
Alfred R...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2023) 132 (4): 637–641.
Published: 01 October 2023
...Glen Pettigrove [email protected] Cherry Myisha , The Case for Rage: Why Anger Is Essential to Anti-racist Struggle . New York : Oxford University Press , 2021 . xv + 203 pp. © 2023 by Cornell University 2023 From Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Truth...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (3): 323–393.
Published: 01 July 2020
... no stance on whether such cases occur. 26. Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson (2002) also significantly weaken the notion of modularity. They characterize a module as “a domain- or task-specific autonomous computational mechanism” (9). Like Carruthers (see below), they also suggest that modules...
FIGURES
| View All (9)
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2005) 114 (1): 1–31.
Published: 01 January 2005
... of Philosophy . Suppl. no. 33: 133 -60. ____. 1997 . Further Reflections on the Sorites Paradox. In Keefe and Smith 1997 , 204 -250. Originally published 1987. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 114, No. 1 (January 2005)
Borderline Cases and Bivalence...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (3): 315–336.
Published: 01 July 2010
...John Martin Fischer The Frankfurt cases have been thought by some philosophers to show that moral responsibility does not require genuine metaphysical access to alternative possibilities. But various philosophers have rejected this putative “lesson” of the cases, and they have put forward...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2002) 111 (1): 127–129.
Published: 01 January 2002
...Don Loeb Cornell University 2002 ETHICAL NORMS, PARTICULAR CASES. By James D. Wallace. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996. Pp. xi, 171. BOOK REVIEWS
This book is a must-read for those interested contemporary normative ethical
theory...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (3): 395–431.
Published: 01 July 2020
...Amia Srinivasan This article presents a novel challenge to epistemic internalism. The challenge rests on a set of cases which feature subjects forming beliefs under conditions of “bad ideology”—that is, conditions in which pervasively false beliefs have the function of sustaining, and are sustained...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2017) 126 (1): 1–41.
Published: 01 January 2017
...Matthew McGrath Walking through the supermarket, I see the avocados. I know they are avocados. Similarly, if you see a pumpkin on my office desk, you can know it's a pumpkin from its looks. The phenomenology in such cases is that of “just seeing” that such and such is the case. This phenomenology...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2013) 122 (2): 189–214.
Published: 01 April 2013
... determined agents are incapable of making a difference, but to argue that responsibility is not grounded in difference making. These compatibilists have rested such a claim on Frankfurt cases—cases where agents are intuitively responsible for acts that they couldn’t have failed to perform. This essay argues...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2010) 119 (1): 1–30.
Published: 01 January 2010
... by Ralph Wedgwood that this essay will call benchmark theory (BT) all advise agents to maximize different types of expected value. Consequently, their verdicts sometimes conflict. In certain famous cases of conflict—medical Newcomb problems—CDT and BT seem to get things right, while EDT seems to get things...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2019) 128 (1): 63–105.
Published: 01 January 2019
...Jacob M. Nebel The standard view of believes and other propositional attitude verbs is that such verbs express relations between agents and propositions. A sentence of the form “ S believes that p ” is true just in case S stands in the belief-relation to the proposition that p ; this proposition...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2020) 129 (3): 433–463.
Published: 01 July 2020
.... Imagine Attacker is trying to kill Victim, and the only way one could save Victim is by killing Attacker. It would seem that, in such a case, killing is necessary. But now suppose there is some other innocent person, suffering some entirely distinct threat, whose life one could save instead. Is killing...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2012) 121 (4): 483–538.
Published: 01 October 2012
... to causal beliefs, and one-boxers to evidential beliefs. The essay notes that a similar issue can arise when the modality in question is chance, rather than causation. In this case, the conflict is between decision rules based on credences guided solely by chances, and rules based on credences guided...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2014) 123 (2): 205–229.
Published: 01 April 2014
... a possible picture of mental causation that suggests itself in light of these results. The overdetermination problem has long been raised as a challenge to nonreductive physicalism. The problem is that a nonreductive physicalist view of mind seems to make every case of mental causation a case...
FIGURES
| View All (5)
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2017) 126 (4): 481–527.
Published: 01 October 2017
... and less controversial case for response-dependence about the funny. In part 2, it shows the tight analogy between anger and amusement in developing the harder and more controversial case for response-dependence about a kind of blameworthiness (and so response-dependence about a kind of responsibility...
1