Search Results for averroes

...Peter Adamson 2. I discuss the parallel argumentation of Avicenna and Averroes in Adamson, 2021. There I agree with Ogden’s point (76) that Avicenna and Averroes both argued from the nature of the object of intellection to secure the nature of the subject of intellect, that is, inferring...

.... Life’s Form will likely seem least impressive to readers familiar with the medi- eval background to Renaissance scholasticism. Des Chene inadvertently reveals from the start that his expertise is rather limited in that direction, when on the very first page he describes Averroes’s commentaries...

... that this often cannot work, he is wrong to blame Thomas for it. Thomas understands his distinctions among senses of being as an interpretation of Aristotle’s account of four senses of being in Metaphysics 5.7; his interpretation largely follows Averroes (and indirectly Farabi), with one crucial...

... understands his distinctions among senses of being as an interpretation of Aristotle’s account of four senses of being in Metaphysics 5.7; his interpretation largely follows Averroes (and indirectly Farabi), with one crucial innovation. Aristotle may intend his “being as truth” purely as a two- place...

... understands his distinctions among senses of being as an interpretation of Aristotle’s account of four senses of being in Metaphysics 5.7; his interpretation largely follows Averroes (and indirectly Farabi), with one crucial innovation. Aristotle may intend his “being as truth” purely as a two- place...

... understands his distinctions among senses of being as an interpretation of Aristotle’s account of four senses of being in Metaphysics 5.7; his interpretation largely follows Averroes (and indirectly Farabi), with one crucial innovation. Aristotle may intend his “being as truth” purely as a two- place...

... that this often cannot work, he is wrong to blame Thomas for it. Thomas understands his distinctions among senses of being as an interpretation of Aristotle’s account of four senses of being in Metaphysics 5.7; his interpretation largely follows Averroes (and indirectly Farabi), with one crucial...

... Duns Scotus. Instead, although it does include passages from both their contemporaries and 567 BOOK REVIEWS their students, the book (rightly) relegates popular works by Averroes, Aquinas, and Scotus to footnotes...

.... There are learned discussions of Epicurus and Seneca; Boethius, Avicenna, and Averroes; Bacon, Locke, and Leibniz—and many more. A third chapter, on Kant's intellectual development during the 1760s and 1770s, also considers Knutzen, Baumgarten, and Meier. Reasons for this unusual approach are given...

.... Translated by David Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press. xliii + 277 pp. Arthos, John. 2009. The Inner Word in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics. Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press. xx + 460 pp. Averroes of Cordoba. (Ibn Rushd). 2009. Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle. Yale Library...

... Christianorum, Series Latina, 50). Turnhout: Brepols. Averroes. 1552 . In ea opera omnes qui ad nos pervenere Commentarii , in Aristotle, Omnia quae extant opera, Venice apud Iuntas. Avicebron. 1892-95 . Fons vitae. Ed. C. Baeumker (Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters 1 , 2 -4...

...,” but her chapter nonetheless contains much of interest and usefully combats misconceptions about thought in Islam, dispelling, for example, the notion that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval...

... that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval Jewish thinkers’ views on creation. The reader will fi nd both chapters to be useful entry points into a rich and relatively unexplored world. Rounding...

... that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval Jewish thinkers’ views on creation. The reader will fi nd both chapters to be useful entry points into a rich and relatively unexplored world. Rounding...

... that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval Jewish thinkers’ views on creation. The reader will fi nd both chapters to be useful entry points into a rich and relatively unexplored world. Rounding...

... that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval Jewish thinkers’ views on creation. The reader will fi nd both chapters to be useful entry points into a rich and relatively unexplored world. Rounding...

...,” but her chapter nonetheless contains much of interest and usefully combats misconceptions about thought in Islam, dispelling, for example, the notion that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval...

... thought in Islam, dispelling, for example, the notion that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval Jewish thinkers’ views on creation. The reader will fi nd both chapters to be useful entry points...

...,” but her chapter nonetheless contains much of interest and usefully combats misconceptions about thought in Islam, dispelling, for example, the notion that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval...

... that philosophy in Islam died out after Averroes (Ibn Rushd) in the thirteenth century. Dobbs- Weinstein organizes her discussion around medieval Jewish thinkers’ views on creation. The reader will fi nd both chapters to be useful entry points into a rich and relatively unexplored world. Rounding...