1-20 of 26 Search Results for

amusement

Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2017) 126 (4): 481–527.
Published: 01 October 2017
... and less controversial case for response-dependence about the funny. In part 2, it shows the tight analogy between anger and amusement in developing the harder and more controversial case for response-dependence about a kind of blameworthiness (and so response-dependence about a kind of responsibility...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (3): 273–316.
Published: 01 July 2006
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2003) 112 (4): 483–523.
Published: 01 October 2003
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (3): 445–448.
Published: 01 July 2008
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (3): 448–451.
Published: 01 July 2008
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (3): 451–455.
Published: 01 July 2008
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (3): 455–458.
Published: 01 July 2008
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (3): 458–462.
Published: 01 July 2008
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (3): 462–464.
Published: 01 July 2008
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (3): 465–468.
Published: 01 July 2008
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2008) 117 (3): 468–471.
Published: 01 July 2008
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2012) 121 (2): 209–239.
Published: 01 April 2012
... only at amusing the subject is not deliberation. A mental activity aimed only at facilitating sleep is not delib- eration. Determining what to think or what to do is thus a constitutive end of deliberation, in the same way that persuasion is a constitutive end of arguing, or getting coffee...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2014) 123 (4): 429–484.
Published: 01 October 2014
... I may have reason to play it incorrectly: Rosen's example is playing incorrectly to amuse someone. Certainly, having botched the opening, there is no obvious requirement to immediately start over. This makes it seem as if standards of correctness are merely descriptive features of the world. Call...
FIGURES
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2002) 111 (2): 205–233.
Published: 01 April 2002
... its compass. Even so intu- itively promising a candidate for minimalism as discourse about com- edy has its share of prima facie causal claims. Consider, for instance: Lord Hailsham “hogged” the conversation shamelessly but the other Fellows forgave him because he was such an amusing...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (2): 243–246.
Published: 01 April 2006
... 1.) But more clever ways to convert axioms into rules give quite nice SCs. I found the discussion of affi ne geometry, including a proof-theoretic proof of the independence of a form of Euclid’s fi fth postulate (the unique- ness axiom for parallel lines) particularly amusing. Chapter 7...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (2): 246–251.
Published: 01 April 2006
...-theoretic proof of the independence of a form of Euclid’s fi fth postulate (the unique- ness axiom for parallel lines) particularly amusing. Chapter 7 considers three intermediate propositional logics: those pro- duced by weak excluded middle and by double-negation elimination (both for atomic...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (2): 251–255.
Published: 01 April 2006
... 1.) But more clever ways to convert axioms into rules give quite nice SCs. I found the discussion of affi ne geometry, including a proof-theoretic proof of the independence of a form of Euclid’s fi fth postulate (the unique- ness axiom for parallel lines) particularly amusing. Chapter 7...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (2): 255–258.
Published: 01 April 2006
...-theoretic proof of the independence of a form of Euclid’s fi fth postulate (the unique- ness axiom for parallel lines) particularly amusing. Chapter 7 considers three intermediate propositional logics: those pro- duced by weak excluded middle and by double-negation elimination (both for atomic...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (2): 259–262.
Published: 01 April 2006
...-theoretic proof of the independence of a form of Euclid’s fi fth postulate (the unique- ness axiom for parallel lines) particularly amusing. Chapter 7 considers three intermediate propositional logics: those pro- duced by weak excluded middle and by double-negation elimination (both for atomic...
Journal Article
The Philosophical Review (2006) 115 (2): 263–267.
Published: 01 April 2006
...-theoretic proof of the independence of a form of Euclid’s fi fth postulate (the unique- ness axiom for parallel lines) particularly amusing. Chapter 7 considers three intermediate propositional logics: those pro- duced by weak excluded middle and by double-negation elimination (both for atomic...