In conversation, we often do not acknowledge what we jointly know to be true. This article identifies a distinctive kind of non-acknowledgment norm, open secrecy norms, and analyzes how such norms constrain our speech. First, the author argues that open secrecy norms are structurally different from other everyday non-acknowledgment norms. Open secrecy norms iterate: when is an open secret, then there’s a norm not to acknowledge that , and this norm is itself an open secret. Then, the author argues that the non-acknowledgment at issue in open secrecy norms motivates a more complex understanding of discourse structure. When interlocutors are conforming to open secrecy norms, they rely on at least two disjoint common grounds, one of which has a privileged status. To understand why and how it is privileged, the author develops Erving Goffman’s notion of defining a social interaction. Finally, the author shows how strategic speakers can exploit the structure of open secrecy norms in order to both communicate about the open secret and shield themselves from retaliation for what they communicate.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
April 01 2025
Citation
Sam Berstler; The Structure of Open Secrets. The Philosophical Review 1 April 2025; 134 (2): 109–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-11676088
Download citation file:
Advertisement
151
Views