This paper defends an account of full belief, including an account of its relationship to credence. Along the way, I address several familiar and difficult questions about belief. Does fully believing a proposition require having maximal confidence in it? Are rational beliefs closed under entailment, or does the preface paradox show that rational agents can believe inconsistent propositions? Does whether you believe a proposition depend partly on your practical interests? My account of belief resolves the tension between conflicting answers to these questions that have been defended in the literature. In addition, my account complements fruitful probabilistic theories of assertion and knowledge.
Skip Nav Destination
Sarah Moss; Full Belief and Loose Speech. The Philosophical Review 1 July 2019; 128 (3): 255–291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-7537270
Download citation file: