The role of the Holocaust in American life is disproportional to the amount of knowledge Americans (and the English, for that matter) tend to have about it. Both in popular discourse and in moral philosophy, the Holocaust is invoked as the ultimate example of evil; as Pauer-Studer and Velleman put it, “a convenient source of toy examples of immorality” (127). Yet the ignorance surrounding it is staggering. More exactly, quite a lot of (often lurid) attention is devoted to Holocaust victims, while its perpetrators receive comparatively little. With the exception of Arendt's Eichmann in Jerusalem no work of philosophy written in English has attempted to understand the moral psychology of a Nazi. The result is not just historically but morally problematic: evil becomes something that other people did, in ways and for reasons as murky and inaccessible as light waves trapped in a discrete...
Book Review| October 01 2017
Konrad Morgen: The Conscience of a Nazi JudgeBook reviewsBook reviews
Pauer-Studer, Herlinde and Velleman, J. David,
Konrad Morgen: The Conscience of a Nazi Judge.
New York: Palgrave Macmillan,
The Philosophical Review (2017) 126 (4): 541–547.
Susan Neiman; Konrad Morgen: The Conscience of a Nazi Judge
Book reviews. The Philosophical Review 1 October 2017; 126 (4): 541–547. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-4173463
Download citation file: