An attractive approach to the semantic paradoxes holds that cases of semantic pathology give rise to indeterminacy. What attitude should a rational agent have toward a proposition that it takes to be indeterminate in this sense? Orthodoxy holds that rationality requires that an agent disbelieve such a proposition. I argue that a rational agent should be such that it is indeterminate whether it believes the proposition in question. For rational agents, indeterminacy in the objects of their attitudes will filter up to the attitudes themselves.
Michael Caie; Belief and Indeterminacy. The Philosophical Review 1 January 2012; 121 (1): 1–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-1426355
Download citation file: