Schmitt's Vision of a Multipolar World Order | Citedby Results | South Atlantic Quarterly | Duke University Press

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Schmitt's Vision of a Multipolar World Order

South Atlantic Quarterly (2005) 104 (2): 245–251.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

On the relevance of Carl Schmitt’s concept of Großraum in contemporary international politics

Roberto Orsi

Journal of International Political Theory (2021) 17 (3): 295.

The Sine Qua Non of Carl Schmitt’s political thinking: The issue of interstate relations

Can Mert Kökerer

Philosophy & Social Criticism (2021) 47 (10): 1137.

In search of a new nomos: Post‐colonially

Ulrike Kistner

Constellations (2020) 27 (2): 273.

Carl Schmitt's postcolonial imagination

Andreas Kalyvas

Constellations (2018) 25 (1): 35.

Hannah Arendt reads Carl Schmitt’s The Nomos of the Earth: A dialogue on law and geopolitics from the margins

Anna Jurkevics

European Journal of Political Theory (2017) 16 (3): 345.

From Nomos to Hegung: Sovereignty and the Laws of War in Schmitt's International Order

Johanna Jacques

The Modern Law Review (2015) 78 (3): 411.

The poverty of exceptionalism in international theory

Ronnie Hjorth

Journal of International Political Theory (2014) 10 (2): 169.

Spatial contestation? – The theological foundations of Carl Schmitt’s spatial thought

Robert Meyer
Conrad Schetter
Janosch Prinz

Geoforum (2012) 43 (4): 687.

The French New Right: multiculturalism of the right and the recognition/exclusionism syndrome

Alberto Spektorowski

Journal of Global Ethics (2012) 8 (1): 41.

Sovereignty and political modernity: A genealogy of Agamben’s critique of sovereignty

Ronald C. Jennings

Anthropological Theory (2011) 11 (1): 23.

Friends and Enemies, Slaves and Masters: Fanaticism, Wendell Phillips, and the Limits of Democratic Theory

Joel Olson

The Journal of Politics (2009) 71 (1): 82.

A Political Mythology of World Order

Mitchell Dean

Theory, Culture & Society (2006) 23 (5): 1.