The stakes of the current shared interest in the idea and the practice of political inquiry are highlighted by the co-research led by Romano Alquati and the Prisons Information Group in which Michel Foucault participated. Each of these experiences produces knowledge through an “antisociology,” that is, through a refusal of the separation of inquiry from political intervention within two incarnations of capitalist power: technologically advanced factories and the prisons. This positioning also invites one to consider political inquiry as a fully fledged mode of organization, to be understood in the context of the debate of the 1960s and 1970s: we propose using Foucauldian thought to understand this form of inquiry as an “antagonistic apparatus” that acts as a “counterinstitution.”
Research Article|
April 01 2019
Co-research as Counterinstitution
Julien Allavena;
Julien Allavena
Julien Allavena is a doctoral student in political theory at the CRESP-PA-Labtop of the University of Paris 8 and is currently working on a historical genealogy of social inquiry as collective action.
Matteo Polleri is a doctoral student in philosophy at the Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa and Université Paris Nanterre whose research focuses on the relationship between Marx and Foucault.
Search for other works by this author on:
South Atlantic Quarterly (2019) 118 (2): 457–469.
Citation
Julien Allavena, Matteo Polleri; Co-research as Counterinstitution. South Atlantic Quarterly 1 April 2019; 118 (2): 457–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7381370
Download citation file: