The services that the domestic worker performs are best described as affective labor. The interactions between domestic workers and their employers occur on the proximity of their bodies and therefore through the affective intensities that constantly are exchanged between them. A significant number of domestic workers in Turkey are migrants who come to the country on their own. However, the migrant domestic worker’s family is a ghostly presence in her employment since the affects she is professionally expected to serve were authentically produced for her own family first. Her mobility is therefore not simply a horizontal displacement but a way to suture affects onto her body that will be debarked later for her employers. A work permit scheme recently introduced for migrant domestic workers in Turkey has been built on the governance of migrant workers as providers of affective labor in all these ways. Arguably, however, the affective plane between women from across the global North and the South that migrant domestic work constructs also holds potential for provoking challenges to this formation of governance.

This content is only available as a PDF.

References

References
Anagnost, Ann.
2006
. “
Strange Circulations: the Blood Economy in Rural China
.”
Economy and Society
35
:
509
29
.
Beck, Ulrich; Beck-Gernsheim, Elisabeth.
2014
.
Distant Love: Personal Life in the Global Age
. Translated by Livingstone, Rodney.
Cambridge, UK
:
Polity
.
De Genova, Nicholas.
2010
. “
The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement
.” In
The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement
, edited by De Genova, Nicholas; Peutz, Nathalie,
33
69
.
Durham, NC
:
Duke University Press
.
Dowling, Emma.
2016
. “
Valorized but not Valued? Affective Remuneration, Social Reproduction and Feminist Politics beyond the Crisis
.”
British Politics
11
:
452
68
.
Foucault, Michel.
1991
.
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
. Translated by Sheridan, Alan.
London
:
Penguin
.
Foucault, Michel.
2003
.
Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76
. Edited by Bertani, Mauro; Fontana, Alessandro. Translated by Macey, David.
London
:
Penguin
.
Grosz, Elizabeth.
1994
.
Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism
.
Bloomington
:
Indiana University Press
.
Han, Sora Y.
2011
. “
Strict Scrutiny: The Tragedy of Constitutional Law
.”
Beyond Biopolitics: Essays on the Governance of Life and Death
.
Durham, NC
:
Duke University Press
.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette; Avila, Ernestine.
1997
. “
‘I’m Here, but I’m There’: The Meanings of Latina Transnational Motherhood
.”
Gender and Society
11
:
548
71
.
Hochschild, Arlie Russel.
2000
. “
Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value
.” In
On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism
, edited by Hutton, Will; Giddens, Anthony,
130
46
.
London
:
Jonathan Cape
.
Hochschild, Arlie Russel.
2012
.
Outsourced Self: What Happens When We Pay Others to Live Our Lives for Us
.
New York
:
Picador
.
Hochschild, Arlie Russel; Ehrenreich, Barbara.
2004
.
Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy
.
London
:
Granta
.
Isaksen, Lise Widding; Devi, Sambasivan Uma; Hochschild, Arlie Russell.
2008
. “
Global Care Crisis: A Problem of Capital, Care Chain, or Commons?
American Behavioral Scientist
52
:
405
25
.
Massumi, Brian.
2002
.
Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation
.
Durham, NC
:
Duke University Press
.
Mazzarella, William.
2017
. “
Sense out of Sense: Notes on the Affect/Ethics Impasse
.”
Cultural Anthropology
32
:
199
208
. .
Mezzadra, Sandro; Neilson, Brett.
2013
.
Border as Method, or, The Multiplication of Labor
.
Durham, NC
:
Duke University Press
.
Millar, Kathleen M.
2014
. “
The Precarious Present: Wageless Labor and Disrupted Life in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
.”
Cultural Anthropology
29
:
32
53
.
Papadopoulos, Dimitris; Stephenson, Niamh; Tsianos, Vassilis.
2008
.
Escape Routes: Control and Subversion in the 21st Century
.
London
:
Pluto
.
Weeks, Kathi.
2007
. “
Life Within and Against Work: Affective Labor, Feminist Critique, and Post-Fordist Politics
.”
Ephemera
7
:
233
49
. .