Novelists whose work grapples with the climate crisis and the urgent need for structural transition return time and again to two questions: Why is it so hard for people to see what's happening? Why do we not seem to be able to imagine the transition to new environmental, social, or political systems? Authors of climate fiction show that environmental futures depend on our ability to renegotiate the limit between the “realistic” and the inconceivable, the boundary that strategically constrains our imagination and that limits social and environmental progress. How, authors ask, thereby responding to debates about the purported crisis of political and social futurity, should the novel respond to the sense that contemporary culture appears to be increasingly unable to generate convincing, hopeful visions of environmental and energy futures beyond capitalism? The contemporary novel engages with the problem of the limited imagination not as a way to dream up naive futures but rather to pinpoint the origins and causes of imaginative impossibility and obstacles to systemic transition. And by making legible the lack that is bound up with the limited imagination, the novel also asks how art itself functions as a specific form of critical and political thought.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2025
Research Article|
January 01 2025
On “Making Sure No One Ever Travels Too Far”: The Climate Novel and Our Limited Imagination Available to Purchase
Mathias Nilges
Mathias Nilges is professor of English at St. Francis Xavier University, Canada. His most recent books are How to Read a Moment: The American Novel and the Crisis of the Present (2021) and (coedited with Mitch R. Murray) the collection of essays William Gibson and the Futures of Contemporary Culture (2021).
Search for other works by this author on:
South Atlantic Quarterly (2025) 124 (1): 77–93.
Citation
Mathias Nilges; On “Making Sure No One Ever Travels Too Far”: The Climate Novel and Our Limited Imagination. South Atlantic Quarterly 1 January 2025; 124 (1): 77–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-11557801
Download citation file:
Advertisement
168
Views