This contribution explores in what ways the Kurdish experience may be called “colonial” and, by extension, what decolonizing Kurdish studies would or could amount to. Specifically, it explores whether and to what extent Kurdish vernacular learning may be qualified as “Indigenous learning” as it appears in decolonial critiques. The article suggests a genealogical approach to the epistemic dimensions of coloniality to explicate the radical historicity of knowledge and to make visible relations of domination and resistance in the field of knowledge and learning. Early modern Kurdish vernacular learning, it will be argued, was produced under the domination of Persian and Arabic, and to some extent it amounted to heresy, that is, an act of symbolic resistance. The article concludes with a brief discussion of the vernacularization of Kurdish language and learning in the seventeenth‐century Ottoman Empire and in Mollah Mahmûdê Bayazîdî’s encounter with nineteenth‐century Russian imperialism and Orientalism.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 2024
Issue Editors
Research Article|
October 01 2024
Kurdish Vernacular Learning as Indigenous Knowledge: Decolonizing Ottoman Cultural and Intellectual History
Michiel Leezenberg
Michiel Leezenberg teaches in the Department of Philosophy of the University of Amsterdam. He has published widely on the history, culture, and politics of the Kurds, and on the history and philosophy of the humanities. In 2022, he received the Jemal Nebez award for his contributions to Kurdish studies.
Search for other works by this author on:
South Atlantic Quarterly (2024) 123 (4): 803–823.
Citation
Michiel Leezenberg; Kurdish Vernacular Learning as Indigenous Knowledge: Decolonizing Ottoman Cultural and Intellectual History. South Atlantic Quarterly 1 October 2024; 123 (4): 803–823. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-11381033
Download citation file:
Advertisement
220
Views