The partition of the Indian subcontinent forced millions of people to flee to the other side of the borders, freshly demarcated by the British colonial rulers just on the eve of their departure from South Asia. Almost a decade-long migration of people could not, however, settle the boundaries and lives of the people once and for all. The postcolonial rulers retained many of the draconian laws of the late colonial period, like the Foreigners’ Act in India, and laced them with new laws and regulations, thus leading to greater dispossession of people of homes, generating widespread situations of un-freedom, and creating countless refugees and stateless persons, mostly forced to survive in sites of precarious life, without any right to have rights. The concern of this contribution is this politics of dispossession in postcolonial South Asia and its relation with citizenship laws of the region.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 1, 2021
Issue Editors
Research Article|
January 01 2021
Dispossession, Un-freedom, Precarity: Negotiating Citizenship Laws in Postcolonial South Asia
South Atlantic Quarterly (2021) 120 (1): 209–219.
Citation
Sabyasachi Basu Ray Chaudhury; Dispossession, Un-freedom, Precarity: Negotiating Citizenship Laws in Postcolonial South Asia. South Atlantic Quarterly 1 January 2021; 120 (1): 209–219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-8795866
Download citation file:
Advertisement