Since the 1980s Latin Americans have had acute difficulties placing their national societies in time—with various narratives competing among each other as available, but often unconvincing, framing devices. Progressive and developmentalist narratives generally lost traction, but emancipatory rhetoric, too, has tended to cede to sentimental gesture and gesticulation, even though it benefits from the backwind of the disasters that were wrought by the Washington consensus. Moreover, the aggressive neoliberal discourse of the 1980s and 1990s conjured up a revival of nineteenth-century political language, including, most prominently, a revival of nineteenth-century republicanism, with its characteristic obsession with corruption, love of country, and republican virtue, but also lesser—but nonetheless perfectly audible—revivals of revolutionary nationalism, anarchism, and various strands of national-popular discourse. In short, there has been a contested arena emerging around the location of Latin America in time—we do not currently know when we are. This essay explores the problem of dependency, neodependency, and chronotopes of development in contemporary Latin American historicities.
Skip Nav Destination
Moishe Postone Moishe Postone
Research Article| April 01 2012
Time and Dependency in Latin America Today
South Atlantic Quarterly (2012) 111 (2): 347–357.
Claudio Lomnitz; Time and Dependency in Latin America Today. South Atlantic Quarterly 1 April 2012; 111 (2): 347–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1548248
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
“Black Land,” “Sick Land,” and “Lost Land”: Dianchi Xiaocun's Topography and the Problem of a Resistance Approach