This essay presents a critical engagement with Giorgio Agamben's conception of “bare life.” Central to the argument is that bareness is produced, and therefore, that which is produced as “bare life” is always marked in advance by the process. What this means is that bareness cannot escape the mark of particularity. This has important implications for how concepts such as sovereignty are understood. The limits of Agamben's position are to be found in the ontological presuppositions that underlie it. In order to counter the inability of Agamben's position to deal with problems of practicality, a relational ontology is proposed as an alternative. The essay centers on Agamben's discussion of the animal and the Jew in the context of his books The Open and Homo Sacer.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| January 01 2008
Particularity and Exceptions: On Jews and Animals
South Atlantic Quarterly (2008) 107 (1): 71–87.
Andrew Benjamin; Particularity and Exceptions: On Jews and Animals. South Atlantic Quarterly 1 January 2008; 107 (1): 71–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2007-056
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In