This is an exercise of enormous difficulty.1 Not because of the quantity of material involved (heavily financed directed research would take care of this), but because its success will be limited by the scholar’s aboriginal concept and perception of wholes. Most people in the post-mediaeval world deal almost instinctively with fragments/specializations. The historian, especially, will periodise his material. There will be general periods: precolumbian, slavery etc; there will be century blocks; and more specific dates e.g. 1492–1500; 1838–1844 etc. There will also be limitations on territorial treatment (Henri Bangou, La Guadeloupe: 3 vols., Paris, 1962, 1963; Douglas Hall, Five of the Leewards; Carib. U. Press, Barbados, 1971), or enterprise (L. J. Ragatz, The fall of the planter class: NY 1928; W. Westergaard, The Dutch West India Company: NY 1917; C. H. Haring, The buccaneers in the West Indies in the 17th century: NY 1910)....

You do not currently have access to this content.