This article analyzes the gendered performances of American military women during the US-led occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. Through an examination of Lioness teams and female engagement teams—all-female teams used to navigate “cultural norms,” present the US military as humanitarian, and facilitate engagements with occupied civilian women—the article argues that the affective labor of women soldiers and marines was strategically instrumentalized for population-centric counterinsurgency warfare. In addition to the gendered labor women perform as counterinsurgents, the article also considers the emotional and often maternal labor military women perform among their comrades, as a means to develop relationships as well as to protect themselves from sexual violence. Ultimately, this article is invested in developing a conversation about women's military participation that considers how gender matters to war, how gendered subjectivities are constituted by, and instrumental in, US imperialism, and what potentially subversive subjects may emerge as a result.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
October 1, 2015
Issue Editors
Other|
October 01 2015
Affective Technologies of War: US Female Counterinsurgents and the Performance of Gendered Labor
Radical History Review (2015) 2015 (123): 60–86.
Citation
Elizabeth Mesok; Affective Technologies of War: US Female Counterinsurgents and the Performance of Gendered Labor. Radical History Review 1 October 2015; 2015 (123): 60–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-3088156
Download citation file:
Advertisement