In 2004, the Washington Historical Court of Justice and Inquiry—a one-time, quasi-legal public history event—symbolically exonerated Nisqually Indian war leader Chief Leschi of the 147-year-old charge of murder. The judges determined that Leschi, who was captured following the 1855–56 Puget Sound War and indicted on criminal charges in territorial court, was a “legal enemy combatant” who had been unjustly denied the protections afforded to prisoners of war under international law. This article examines the Historical Court judges' decision in the context of the US War on Terror and detainment of so-called illegal enemy combatants. The Historical Court sought justice for Leschi by acknowledging his legal warrior status, but failed to interrogate the cultural assumptions that lead US officials to categorize certain enemies—in 1857 as well as 2004—as exceptional and outside of regular applications of law.
Skip Nav Destination
Other| May 01 2012
The Quest for a Legal Enemy: Symbolic Justice during the War on Terror
Radical History Review (2012) 2012 (113): 55–65.
Lisa Blee; The Quest for a Legal Enemy: Symbolic Justice during the War on Terror. Radical History Review 1 May 2012; 2012 (113): 55–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1504894
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
1 Web of Science
Citing articles via
Editors' Introduction: “Calling the Law into Question” Confronting the Illegal and Illicit in Public Arenas