Recent resurgences of “populist” parties, from the Alternative für Deutschland in Germany to the National Rally in France, haunt political debates.1 While theorists like Chantal Mouffe present left-wing populism as a necessary strategy against the Right,2 Éric Fassin declares such a strategy ineffective,3 and Jan-Werner Müller even considers it a threat to democracy itself.4 What unites the divergent positions is the claim that there are no people as such preceding the populists’ evocation. Rather, there exist “diverse and even antagonistic images of the people,”5 as Jacques Rancière puts it. Drawing on the insight that these images are fabricated by popular media and forms, Ethel Matala de Mazza’s study The Popular Pact: Negotiations of Modernity between Operetta and Feuilleton (my translation) traces the sociocultural emergence of the elusive foundation of modern democracy: the common folk. At stake in Matala de Mazza’s history of these “small forms”...
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Review Article|
June 01 2020
Pact with the People?: Popular Genres, Public Concerns, and the Politics of Representation
A review of Matala de Mazza, Ethel,
Der populäre Pakt: Verhandlungen der Moderne zwischen Operette und Feuilleton
(Frankfurt am Main
: Fischer
, 2018
). Cited in the text as dp.
Jonas Teupert
Jonas Teupert
jonas teupert is a doctoral candidate in the Department of German at the University of California, Berkeley, where he is also pursuing a designated emphasis in critical theory. His research combines media and mobility studies and situates German literature in a global and transnational context.
Search for other works by this author on:
Qui Parle (2020) 29 (1): 203–215.
Citation
Jonas Teupert; Pact with the People?: Popular Genres, Public Concerns, and the Politics of Representation. Qui Parle 1 June 2020; 29 (1): 203–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10418385-8241960
Download citation file:
Advertisement
49
Views