Long-term Chinese heroin users in a southwestern mining city complain that they feel stuck in the past. Departing from narratives that focus on the potency of the opiate, this article argues that this cohort of heroin users experience their struggles as a form of hysteresis—they lag behind ongoing transformations of private-sector life occurring around them. First exploring the arrival of heroin during early post-Mao economic liberalization campaigns, the author shows how in the late 1980s and early 1990s the opiate briefly circulated among private-sector actors who cultivated “daring” dispositions to take advantage of dangerous emerging market opportunities. By the second decade of the twenty-first century, one-time private-sector pioneers see their heroin use as one of many maladapted habits hindering their participation in a local economy now dominated by different types of workers. Recovery, according to these long-time users, is not conceived of as an attempt to return to an earlier way of drug-free living; rather, to recover is to adapt to the economic and social demands of a different historical moment. The conclusion considers how understanding this cohort as entrepreneurs from the country’s recent past contributes to broader discussions of experiences of marginalization among workers in China and beyond.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
August 01 2018
The Ones Who Struck Out:Entrepreneurialism, Heroin Addiction, and Historical Obsolescence in Reform Era China
Nicholas Bartlett
Nicholas Bartlett
Nicholas Bartlett, a medical and psychological anthropologist, is an assistant professor in the Department of Asian and Middle Eastern Cultures at Barnard College, Columbia University. He currently is finishing a book manuscript tentatively titled Recovering Histories: Heroin, Labor, and Experiences of “Return” in Reform era China.
Search for other works by this author on:
positions (2018) 26 (3): 423–449.
Citation
Nicholas Bartlett; The Ones Who Struck Out:Entrepreneurialism, Heroin Addiction, and Historical Obsolescence in Reform Era China. positions 1 August 2018; 26 (3): 423–449. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-6868225
Download citation file:
Advertisement
62
Views