In this essay I suggest that rather than asking whether China or Vietnam is becoming neoliberal, we might be better served by asking how Chinese or Vietnamese political and social actors make use of neoliberal ideas and techniques for their own ends. A central task of the anthropology of neoliberalism today thus is to investigate how such historically and culturally contingent articulations of neoliberal logics and techniques work out (or do not work out) in diverse social and political settings. To illustrate this point, I highlight some of the convergent and divergent issues in two important domains: ethics and techniques of the self and class making and space making. I argue that such flexible postsocialist assemblages with their own characteristics may well become a distinct and viable pathway of social formation that dislocates the prevailing way of thinking about social change and world historical trajectory. Finally, I briefly discuss some research possibilities that deserve further attention in the future study of postsocialist assemblages from the margin.
Skip Nav Destination
Ann M Leshkowich Christina Schwenkel
Research Article| May 01 2012
Afterword: Flexible Postsocialist Assemblages from the Margin
positions (2012) 20 (2): 659–667.
Li Zhang; Afterword: Flexible Postsocialist Assemblages from the Margin. positions 1 May 2012; 20 (2): 659–667. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-1538542
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In