This article examines the history of populist politics in Asia, and particularly in Thailand, in relation to two major developments: the rise of culturalism on the one hand, and the emergence of technologically mediated forms of protest politics on the other. Against a backdrop in which culturalism came to displace the more agonistic framework of class analysis, the essay explores transformations in the concept of political subjectivity, and the degree to which theatricalized expressions of discontent came to stand in for other kinds of politicization. I suggest that this mediatized drive to expression is borne of a desire for recognition within a distorted concept of the public sphere, and I argue further that the terms by which an escape from subalternity is being pursued in the contemporary world are no longer only those of “being heard” or “having a voice,” but of being “seen to speak.” This fact is then understood in terms of other developments in the global economy, and in reference to the specific history of electoral politics in the era of Thaksin Shinawatra.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| February 01 2012
Populist Politics in Asian Networks: Positions for Rethinking the Question of Political Subjectivity
positions (2012) 20 (1): 37–65.
Rosalind C. Morris; Populist Politics in Asian Networks: Positions for Rethinking the Question of Political Subjectivity. positions 1 February 2012; 20 (1): 37–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-1471374
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In