The academic debate on the interpretation of literary texts has always suffered from the semantic ambiguity of key concepts (literature, meaning,interpretation, literary study, etc.). To get out of this dead end, literary scholars have to step back from their daily routine from time to time to consider what kind of activity they are actually engaged in, since nothing in academia is natural or self-evident; instead, all is contingent. That is,scholars are not talking about literary texts as givens or data; they are talking about problems they have with what they deem literary items. If literary scholars aim at a scientific solution for their respective problems,they have to meet the usual standards of science; that is, they have to solve explicitly spelled-out problems via explicit problem-solving strategies or methods. This holds equally true for all problems subsumed under the title“interpretation.” The point is not can interpretation be reasonable, possible, or neglectable; rather, can literary scholars perform the operation called interpretation in terms of theory-guided operationalized productions of experiential knowledge which can be stabilized in respective scholarly discourses via communicative connectability and intersubjective inspection.

Blaudzun, Klaus, and Heinz-Jürgen Staszack
1992
“Dialektik der Interpretation: Zu Voraussetzungen des methodologischen Nachdenkens der literaturwissenschaftlichen Interpretation,” in
Danneberg and Vollhardt 1992
:
43
-59.
Danneberg, Lutz
1992
“Einleitung, Interpretation und Argumentation: Fragestellungen der Interpretations-theorie,” in
Danneberg and Vollhardt 1992
:
13
-23.
Danneberg, Lutz, and Friedrich Vollhardt, eds.
1992
Vom Umgang mit Literatur und Literaturgeschichte
(Stuttgart: Metzler).
Eibl, Karl
1992
“Sind Interpretationen falsifizierbar?” in
Danneberg and Vollhardt 1992
:
169
-83.
Foerster, Heinz von
1993
Wissen und Gewissen: Versuch einer Brücke
, edited by Siegfried J. Schmidt (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Habermas, Jürgen
1981
Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns
, 2 vols. (Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp).
Luhmann, Niklas
1990
Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft
(Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Maturana, Humberto R.
1970
Biology of Cognition
(Urbana: University of Illinois Press).
Ong, Walter J.
1987
Oralität und Literalität: Die Technologisierung des Wortes
[Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word] (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).
Schmidt, Siegfried J.
1994
Kognitive Autonomie und soziale Orientierung
(Frankfurt am Main:Suhrkamp).
1996
“ `System' und `Beobachter': Zwei wichtige Konzepte in der (künftigen) literaturwissenschaftlichen Forschung,”in
Systemtheorie der Literatur
, edited by Jürgen Fohrmann and Harro Müller,
106
-33 (Munich: W. Fink).
1998
Die Zähmung des Blicks:Konstruktivismus—Empirie—Wissenschaft
(Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Spencer Brown, George
1972
Laws of Form
(New York: Julian Press).
Stadler, Michael, and Peter Kruse
1990
“Über Wirklichkeitskriterien,” in
Zur Biologie der Kognition
, edited by Volker Riegas and Christian Vetter,
133
-58 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp).
Vaihinger, Hans
1918
Die Philosophie des Als Ob.
3
(Leipzig: F. Meiner).
von Weizsäcker, Carl F.
1980
Der Garten des Menschlichen: Beiträge zur geschichtlichen Anthropologie
(Munich: C. Hanser).
This content is only available as a PDF.
This content is made freely available by the publisher. It may not be redistributed or altered. All rights reserved.