Historical Poetics, while in many ways an ally of Russian Formalism, finds itself in an uneasy relationship with the empiricist mode of formalist enquiry inasmuch as the latter is seen as generally inimical to historical contextualization. On the other hand, representatives of both Historical Poetics and the morphological method have at different points been accused of favoring atomizing analysis over aesthetic appreciation. This putative inability to grasp the work of art as a totality is a taint that literary theory inherited from nineteenth-century philology, whose mission was precisely to combine historicization with minute attention to details of verbal texture. By emphasizing their shared philological patrimony, the article argues for a reconciliation between the morphological method and Historical Poetics. The approach to literary forms it puts forward, which detects historical vitality in distinct elements revealed by morphological analysis, takes its inspiration from Alexander Veselovsky's theory of motif and Mikhail Bakhtin's concepts of architectonics and the chronotope.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| September 01 2017
How to Murder a Work of Art: Philology, Historical Poetics, and the Morphological Method
Poetics Today (2017) 38 (3): 485–518.
Boris Maslov; How to Murder a Work of Art: Philology, Historical Poetics, and the Morphological Method. Poetics Today 1 September 2017; 38 (3): 485–518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-4166671
Download citation file: