If human reproduction is a realm of future-making practice, its refusal or absence effects a reconceptualization of the future. The article examines three very different refusals of the child: the idealist antinatalism of Otto Weininger's Sex and Character (1903), the queer refusal of reproductive futurism in Lee Edelman's No Future (2004), and the negation of the thinkability of fatherhood through the trauma of Auschwitz in Imre Kertész's Kaddish for a Child Not Born (1990). The complexity and incommensurability of the critical stances of antireproductive antifuturism articulated in these texts make it necessary to reconsider any overly simplistic or affirmative alignment of “the child” with “the future.” The nonreproductive (non)futures the texts variously envisage call on us to think instead in terms of multiple possible meanings that can inhere in refusals of the child — whether in the asceticist-misogynist, queer, or catastrophic mode.
Skip Nav Destination
September 1, 2016
Alastair Renfrew Caitr?´ona N?´ Dhu´ill
Research Article| September 01 2016
Refusing the Child: Weininger, Edelman, Kertész
Poetics Today (2016) 37 (3): 369–385.
Caitríona Ní Dhúill; Refusing the Child: Weininger, Edelman, Kertész. Poetics Today 1 September 2016; 37 (3): 369–385. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-3599315
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In
Citing articles via
Marriage (Still) Matters: The Contribution of Demographic Change to Trends in Childlessness in the United States