The article investigates some textual coincidences between Denis Diderot's major works on art and theater and the Formalist manifesto “Art as Device” by Victor Shklovsky. Acknowledging the accidental nature of these coincidences, I try to determine the common philosophical origins of the metaphors that aesthetics “lived by” in mid-eighteenth-century France and in Russia at the beginning of the twentieth century. What kind of cultural crisis engenders the cult of difficulty and retardation? How is this aesthetics connected to the idea of freedom? In order to answer these questions, we trace the key notion of Shklovsky's theory, the automatization of perception, back to its “personified version”—l'homme-automate of Diderot. The modernity of both these authors consists in their special concern with the deliberate distancing of artistic representation from the reality represented. Studying the phenomenon of the delinearization of human perception from the semiotic viewpoint, the article discusses visual counterparts of literary estrangement, such as anamorphic structures in painting and the art of pantomime in the theater.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| March 01 2006
Distortion and Theatricality: Estrangement in Diderot and Shklovsky
Poetics Today (2006) 27 (1): 3–33.
Tatiana Smoliarova; Distortion and Theatricality: Estrangement in Diderot and Shklovsky. Poetics Today 1 March 2006; 27 (1): 3–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-27-1-3
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In