The books under review here envision models of professional development not as episodes of developing skills or training faculty to conform to changing laws, rules, and pet projects of administrators, but rather as collaborative processes of education and reflection that encourage faculty to rethink their practices. They draw on research in composition theory and pedagogy, suggesting that more effective learning takes place when teachers trust learners to consider their own need for knowledge, invite learners to devise variations and applications of received knowledge, and resist keeping things simple to be sure they are correct. Applying different focuses, these books consider how to put teacher-learners at the center of the process of their own professional development. Jeffrey Jablonski argues that the expertise developed in composition studies needs to be recognized and respected in initiatives to implement Cross-Curricular Literacy programs. The writers of The Everyday Writing Center consider how, in the midst of increased professionalization, to maintain the serendipitous—even carnivalesque, at times—learning and teaching that the intimate and nonhierarchical space of a writing center can foster. And the collective wisdom in The Writing Center Director's Resource Book surveys the current state of writing center theory and practice, providing a reflective guide for developing the expertise of writing center administrators, who are (or could be) leaders in campus faculty development efforts.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Review Article|
October 01 2008
Writing Centers and Cross-Curricular Literacy Programs as Models for Faculty Development
Pedagogy (2008) 8 (3): 523–536.
Citation
Linda S. Bergmann; Writing Centers and Cross-Curricular Literacy Programs as Models for Faculty Development. Pedagogy 1 October 2008; 8 (3): 523–536. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2008-010
Download citation file:
Advertisement
25
Views