Abstract
This article discusses and situates various grading practices — such as labor‐based grading and specification grading — and their applications within a community college setting. Through two community college instructor voices with two disparate and continuing grading journeys, this article reflects on how these grading practices affect community college students in unforeseen and unjust ways, and ultimately argues that instructors should offer grading choices in order to serve the complex lives and needs of community college students.
labor‐based grading, specification grading, grading options, coconstructed rubrics, assessment, community college
Copyright © 2024 by Duke University Press
2024
Issue Section:
Articles
You do not currently have access to this content.