This article offers readers a case study of a course-based tutoring partnership that frames and enhances the focus on the stories of three participants—two with learning disabilities. The first part engages arguments involving connections between learning-disabled and typical basic writing students to ask the important question: should learning-disabled students receive more institutionally sanctioned time, attention, and pedagogical care than mainstream students, especially if they are also in basic writing courses? I offer course-based tutoring and peer review and response groups as loci for exploring that query. In the article's second part, I narrate the sorts of ethical choices that emerged as I began to focus on the participants in this study. I describe the interactions of the participants as they worked together, and with other students, in two peer review and response sessions. The article's third part provides a more intimate gaze into the backgrounds and experiences of all three participants, offering readers a sense of just how compelling and unexpected the participant stories proved to be, behind the scenes and beyond the classroom. The article concludes with some thoughts on how this poignant experience with two students with learning disabilities taught us all the value of what it means to struggle, to persevere, and to make the most of what “others” of all backgrounds and abilities have to offer.
Skip Nav Destination
October 1, 2015
Allison P Hobgood
Research Article| October 01 2015
Learning Disability and Response-Ability: Reciprocal Caring in Developmental Peer Response Writing Groups and Beyond
Pedagogy (2015) 15 (3): 459–475.
Steven J. Corbett; Learning Disability and Response-Ability: Reciprocal Caring in Developmental Peer Response Writing Groups and Beyond. Pedagogy 1 October 2015; 15 (3): 459–475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2917041
Download citation file:
Don't already have an account? Register
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your InstitutionSign In