Abstract

Post-foundational Discourse Theory (PFDT), initially developed by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, provides a systematic discursive perspective on political phenomena, the economy included. However, ever since Laclau and Mouffe rejected economism in their Hegemony and Social Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (HSS), the economy as an object of study has failed to receive the attention it deserves within this strand of ideology and discourse theory. Different approaches to political economy could also benefit from an explicit engagement with PFDT. I begin by outlining Laclau and Mouffe's postfoundational perspective to the economy. I will then return to their discussion of economism in HSS and argue against its rejection in PFDT as an object of study. Finally, I will critically examine Mark Devenney's attempt to reinstate property as an object of importance for political theory and analysis.

The text of this article is only available as a PDF.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.