Abstract
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has emerged as an outspoken challenger to US geopolitical preeminence in the Americas. This study explores the framing practices employed by mainstream newspaper outlets in the United States in their coverage of President Chavez over a ten-year time period—between 1998, the year he was first elected president, and December 2007. This content analysis examines media output from a number of influential newspapers: The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post. Using an inductive approach, I identify and critically assess the dominant media frames that emerged over this time period: the Dictator Frame, the Castro Disciple Frame, the Declining Economy Frame, and the Meddler-in-the-Region Frame. I also explore how journalistic norms—like personalization, dramatization, novelty, and authority-order—inform media coverage of this key Latin American leader.
Author notes
The author thanks Casey Nishimura at Pacific University for outstanding research assistance. Thanks also to Robin Hahnel, Regina Lawrence, and Kaia Sand for their helpful feedback as well as Joseph Peschek and the anonymous referees for their constructive comments.
