Abstract

Hardt and Negri’s Empire has emerged as an ambitious and influential attempt to theorize some of the most pressing political concerns of our time. I examine Empire’s reach into contemporary politics—a hitherto neglected aspect of its influence—by explaining how it came to be at the center of fierce debates at the last national congress of Rifondazione Comunista, a political party of the Italian left. I then develop a critique of Empire as a failed attempt to transcend the theoretical and political horizons of Marxism. While Empire presents itself as a radically new theory, it is better understood as the latest of incarnation of spontaneity, a conspicuously old orientation. Finally, I recover Lenin’s critique of spontaneity, using it to make sense of some of the most peculiar ambiguities in Empire and to critique it as neither original nor adequate to face the political challenges of our time.

The text of this article is only available as a PDF.

Author notes

*

I would like to thank for their help Anna Maria Addari, Timothy Brennan, James Farr, Christopher Isett, Marco Marinangeli, August Nimtz, Kartik Raj, Joel Wainwright, and, dulcis in fundo, Latha Varadarajan. I would also like to thank the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.